<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Global Protect and Bandwidth Considerations in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-and-bandwidth-considerations/m-p/185241#M56698</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry I guess I shoulda been clearer.&amp;nbsp; I realize it's not about the VPN per se, but it is because we're looking at not allowing split-tunneling.&amp;nbsp; So GP VPN users with a normal user count of 800-1200 with a high water mark of 2500 or so would have all their traffic coming down the tunnel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was my thoughts...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today home users have 10Mbps to 1Gpbs home network connections.&amp;nbsp; I'm trying to understand the potential scope of impact if I turn split-tunneling off.&amp;nbsp; (Essentially what experience&amp;nbsp;you guys have had.)&amp;nbsp; Is this a problem which really isn't a problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today secured routes are only my corporate&amp;nbsp;IP space all other traffic goes through a cloud service.&amp;nbsp; If I flip that migrate to GP VPN and turn split-tunneling off what general amount of BW do I need to account for?&amp;nbsp; If I'm at home and download a 3GB OVA that traffic now comes over VPN.&amp;nbsp; Add in users watching FB video or YouTube or really any other of today's web activities should I be concerned about that additional VPN load?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 20:47:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-02T20:47:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Global Protect and Bandwidth Considerations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-and-bandwidth-considerations/m-p/184975#M56659</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looking for feedback on what you all have experienced with GP VPN for a user count of over 2k users.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Specifically what type of INet circuits that were needed.&amp;nbsp; What was the amount of bandwithd which was seen on the circuits?&amp;nbsp; Finally, is there any sort of way to limit the amount of bandwidth each host can consume?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2017 19:05:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-and-bandwidth-considerations/m-p/184975#M56659</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-01T19:05:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect and Bandwidth Considerations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-and-bandwidth-considerations/m-p/185231#M56695</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This isn't a function of the VPN client, but a function of your usage.&amp;nbsp; If you connect 2,000 people and use RDP&amp;nbsp;@ 250Kbps then you would need a 500Mb connection (assuming they are all using this steady amount of traffic all at the same time).&amp;nbsp; If you have people using various applications such as Word, Excel, Outlook it will vary.&amp;nbsp; I would suspect that a 200Mbps Internet circuit would be fine.&amp;nbsp; Note:&amp;nbsp; This is a dedicated business class service from an actual ISP (such as Level3) and not a cable company or home user type service (think Comcast/TimeWarner or Verizon Fios).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've never had to limit user speed on the GP vpn.&amp;nbsp; I don't see an easy option.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:31:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-and-bandwidth-considerations/m-p/185231#M56695</guid>
      <dc:creator>davanderson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-02T19:31:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect and Bandwidth Considerations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-and-bandwidth-considerations/m-p/185241#M56698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Sorry I guess I shoulda been clearer.&amp;nbsp; I realize it's not about the VPN per se, but it is because we're looking at not allowing split-tunneling.&amp;nbsp; So GP VPN users with a normal user count of 800-1200 with a high water mark of 2500 or so would have all their traffic coming down the tunnel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was my thoughts...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today home users have 10Mbps to 1Gpbs home network connections.&amp;nbsp; I'm trying to understand the potential scope of impact if I turn split-tunneling off.&amp;nbsp; (Essentially what experience&amp;nbsp;you guys have had.)&amp;nbsp; Is this a problem which really isn't a problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Today secured routes are only my corporate&amp;nbsp;IP space all other traffic goes through a cloud service.&amp;nbsp; If I flip that migrate to GP VPN and turn split-tunneling off what general amount of BW do I need to account for?&amp;nbsp; If I'm at home and download a 3GB OVA that traffic now comes over VPN.&amp;nbsp; Add in users watching FB video or YouTube or really any other of today's web activities should I be concerned about that additional VPN load?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 20:47:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-and-bandwidth-considerations/m-p/185241#M56698</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-02T20:47:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

