<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Application Risk level in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187531#M57049</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;What happens when you change an application risk number from a 5 to a 1? Does this just change the read out of your risk level or does it change the way the firewall acts on the application?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-16T19:14:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Application Risk level</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187531#M57049</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What happens when you change an application risk number from a 5 to a 1? Does this just change the read out of your risk level or does it change the way the firewall acts on the application?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187531#M57049</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-16T19:14:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Application Risk level</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187558#M57052</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Application risk levels are only cosmetic, they do not directly affect any action on the firewall. So if you change one, it is just a visual change.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you create an Application Filter that uses the risk level as its trigger, then any changes you make to an app's risk level will be calculated there as well.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:38:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187558#M57052</guid>
      <dc:creator>gwesson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-16T19:38:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Application Risk level</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187565#M57055</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/28203"&gt;@gwesson&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;that is what I thought but one of my coworker is changing them but I don't think it is gaining him anything other a lower risk rating. I think if you did an application override you would get different results&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 19:53:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187565#M57055</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-16T19:53:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Application Risk level</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187584#M57059</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/18719"&gt;@jdprovine&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What exactly is your coworker trying to do? Lowering the risk level, and overall fine-tuning the risk to your environment, is nice to do in a handful of situations. Application filters are effected if you built them by risk, Risk reports will probably mirror the environment&amp;nbsp;you are in, and some other benefits.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Most of the installs I've seen don't take the time to do anything with Application Risk levels, but if you aren't decrypting traffic lowing the risk level of web-browsing and SSL could give you nicer looking management&amp;nbsp;reports.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:42:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187584#M57059</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-16T21:42:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Application Risk level</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187688#M57072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure what his point is but I am going to talk to them today and clarify that it is only making cosmetic changes, it is not changing the way the PA acts on that app.&amp;nbsp; I think he may mistaken&amp;nbsp; the recommendation of the SE to make sure that regularly used application be allowed through the firewall.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2017 13:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-risk-level/m-p/187688#M57072</guid>
      <dc:creator>jdprovine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-17T13:53:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

