<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Question regarding VM series HA after a hardware failure in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/question-regarding-vm-series-ha-after-a-hardware-failure/m-p/189222#M57310</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Administrative operations that change the VM's UUID (clone, backup/restore, etc.) could invalidate the license, requiring you to contact support.&amp;nbsp; For these types of events, VMware usually asks the administrator if the VM was "moved" or "copied".&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;In these scenarios, the right answer is "moved".&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:31:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jvalentine</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-29T21:31:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Question regarding VM series HA after a hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/question-regarding-vm-series-ha-after-a-hardware-failure/m-p/189201#M57306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am new to VM series PAs and looking into how to setup HA.&amp;nbsp; So it is interesting that the license is attached to the host and VM file location.&amp;nbsp; Any change in this needs a re-registration of the license via tech support.&amp;nbsp; Even using VMotion would trigger a need for a support call.&amp;nbsp; I then assumed that I could put one VM on a separate Hypervisor in case of a hardware failure, but then while setting up HA, I checked a help screen that stated a requirement for HA is that both VMs are on the same Hypervisor.&amp;nbsp; So, it sounds like this configuration is vulnerable to a hardware failure on the host, which doesn't sound like good HA to me.&amp;nbsp; How is this mitigated, or am I missing something?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ccfalkner&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:03:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/question-regarding-vm-series-ha-after-a-hardware-failure/m-p/189201#M57306</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccfalkner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-29T21:03:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question regarding VM series HA after a hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/question-regarding-vm-series-ha-after-a-hardware-failure/m-p/189215#M57307</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I v-motion my VM-Series firewalls all the time and haven't ever had to contact support for licensing issues.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are configured in an Active-Passive HA Pair and are almost always located on different hosts to protect against hardware failure.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Same Hypervisor" configuration recommendation for High Availability probably means that they both need to be running on ESXi, not one on ESXi and another on Hyper-V (or KVM, or Citrix Netscaler, etc.)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:13:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/question-regarding-vm-series-ha-after-a-hardware-failure/m-p/189215#M57307</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvalentine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-29T21:13:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question regarding VM series HA after a hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/question-regarding-vm-series-ha-after-a-hardware-failure/m-p/189218#M57308</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;That is good to hear.&amp;nbsp; I specifically asked about VMotion in a support call and received the information I stated.&amp;nbsp; I am glad that it is wrong.&amp;nbsp; It was too simple of a problem to exist.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:16:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/question-regarding-vm-series-ha-after-a-hardware-failure/m-p/189218#M57308</guid>
      <dc:creator>ccfalkner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-29T21:16:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Question regarding VM series HA after a hardware failure</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/question-regarding-vm-series-ha-after-a-hardware-failure/m-p/189222#M57310</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Administrative operations that change the VM's UUID (clone, backup/restore, etc.) could invalidate the license, requiring you to contact support.&amp;nbsp; For these types of events, VMware usually asks the administrator if the VM was "moved" or "copied".&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;In these scenarios, the right answer is "moved".&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:31:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/question-regarding-vm-series-ha-after-a-hardware-failure/m-p/189222#M57310</guid>
      <dc:creator>jvalentine</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-29T21:31:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

