https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-weighted-round-roubin/m-p/192808#M57878 <P>The weights are simply relative to each other with higher being better (up to 255).&nbsp; So in your case I would simply use 100 and 10 as the values matching the bandwidth of the circuits.</P><P>&nbsp;</P> Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:18:02 GMT pulukas 2017-12-22T01:18:02Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-weighted-round-roubin/m-p/192691#M57856 <P>Hi,</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>I have a case where we have to PA FWs and there is 3 connections between them,</P><P>1- Two Microwave&nbsp;Links (Up to&nbsp;100mbps)</P><P>2- One DSP Link (Up to 10mbps)</P><P>&nbsp;</P><P>There is a total of 3 IPSec Tunnels and i'm using weighted round robin, however, i don't know how to calculate the weights and what numbers i should put in the ECMP to reflect the real speeds of the links.</P> Thu, 21 Dec 2017 12:43:57 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-weighted-round-roubin/m-p/192691#M57856 SecurityConsultant 2017-12-21T12:43:57Z https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-weighted-round-roubin/m-p/192808#M57878 <P>The weights are simply relative to each other with higher being better (up to 255).&nbsp; So in your case I would simply use 100 and 10 as the values matching the bandwidth of the circuits.</P><P>&nbsp;</P> Fri, 22 Dec 2017 01:18:02 GMT https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ecmp-weighted-round-roubin/m-p/192808#M57878 pulukas 2017-12-22T01:18:02Z