<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic qos for video and voice in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/qos-for-video-and-voice/m-p/198721#M58971</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;HI,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am&amp;nbsp;using cisco expressway (sip and&amp;nbsp; h323),What is the recommendation for qos&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:23:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>simsim</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-04T10:23:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>qos for video and voice</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/qos-for-video-and-voice/m-p/198721#M58971</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;HI,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am&amp;nbsp;using cisco expressway (sip and&amp;nbsp; h323),What is the recommendation for qos&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 04 Feb 2018 10:23:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/qos-for-video-and-voice/m-p/198721#M58971</guid>
      <dc:creator>simsim</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-04T10:23:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: qos for video and voice</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/qos-for-video-and-voice/m-p/198905#M59007</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The answer is it depends. It depends on how much bandwidth is between the sites. How much of that traffic is voice/video. and what you are comfortable with.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i.e. lets say you have 100M between sites and only see usage of about 10-15 megs of voice/video. In this case I would probably set my QoS to be 25% (just my 2 cents) of the total bandwidth. This would allow for spikes in traffic and still give a small buffer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just remember that youre not saving that bandwidth, i.e. not usuable for anything other than voice/video. All its saying is that if there is voice/video, give it priority upto 25% of the 100M.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Featured-Articles/Getting-Started-Quality-of-Service/ta-p/68633" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Featured-Articles/Getting-Started-Quality-of-Service/ta-p/68633&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I look at it as a moving target rather than a set and forget it setting.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 22:28:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/qos-for-video-and-voice/m-p/198905#M59007</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-05T22:28:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: qos for video and voice</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/qos-for-video-and-voice/m-p/202828#M59816</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We use QoS for prioritisation of packets, rather than limiting/guaranteeing bandwidth.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;By default, all traffic is put into Class 4 on the firewall.&amp;nbsp; Then we have two QoS Profiles:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; - one that matches SIP traffic that we put into Class 2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; - one that matches RTP/RTSP traffic that we put into Class 1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That way, all traffic is delivered in a first-come/first-served manner ... until there's network congestion. At that point, RTP/RTSP traffic gets sent out first, STP traffic gets sent out next, and everything else is sent when there's room.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All of the firewalls in our WAN are configured the same, with MPLS or direct fibre links connecting them back to the central firewall.&amp;nbsp; That handles sending the traffic out from the firewalls.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On the LAN side of things, we use DSCP in our VoIP/videoconferencing systems (af for SIP traffic, ef for RTP/RTSP traffic) with all the switches configured to respect DSCP tags.&amp;nbsp; And we have the Security Profiles on the firewalls configured to set the DSCP tag for SIP/RTP/RTSP traffic.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The only issue we ran into was the 1 Gbps limit for interfaces with QoS enabled, regardless of what the interface could actually handle.&amp;nbsp; We had a 2 Gbps LACP interface (using two 1 Gbps physical interfaces) that was being limited to 1 Gbps because we had enabled QoS on it.&amp;nbsp; This was fixed in PanOS 7.1.11 ... we were running 7.1.10.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; We've since upgraded and re-enabled QoS on the LACP interface and no longer have that limit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VoIP/videoconferencing traffic has been working nicely with the above setup.&amp;nbsp; Not sure if it's "the perfect setup", but it's working for us.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp; Always open to suggestions, though.&amp;nbsp; &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:"&gt;😄&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 17:25:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/qos-for-video-and-voice/m-p/202828#M59816</guid>
      <dc:creator>fjwcash</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-28T17:25:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

