<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Multiple Cisco Router IPSec tunnels to single Palo Alto IPSec Tunnel in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-cisco-router-ipsec-tunnels-to-single-palo-alto-ipsec/m-p/202908#M59846</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear peers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been fighting an issue for about a month regarding issues running Cisco DMVPN behind a static 1-to-1 NAT address (VeloCloud not a Palo Alto).&amp;nbsp; I am currently still trying to ascertain if this is an issue with the VeloCloud appliance (I have a ticket open with them) or moving the Cisco DMVPN solution behind a NAT.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This being said, I was wondering if there is a way to setup a "many-to-one" configuration for VPN in my Palo Alto that would&amp;nbsp;where I could configure my remote Cisco routers (public DHCP or static) to connect to a single tunnel.&amp;nbsp; I know that I wont get full mesh&amp;nbsp;or nhrp shortcuts, but at this point I am looking to move a few Cisco devices to the Palo Alto to rule out DMVPN itself as being an issue.&amp;nbsp; Is this possible?&amp;nbsp; Can&amp;nbsp; anyone&amp;nbsp;cite a configuration example?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:27:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mlinsemier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-28T22:27:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multiple Cisco Router IPSec tunnels to single Palo Alto IPSec Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-cisco-router-ipsec-tunnels-to-single-palo-alto-ipsec/m-p/202908#M59846</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear peers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been fighting an issue for about a month regarding issues running Cisco DMVPN behind a static 1-to-1 NAT address (VeloCloud not a Palo Alto).&amp;nbsp; I am currently still trying to ascertain if this is an issue with the VeloCloud appliance (I have a ticket open with them) or moving the Cisco DMVPN solution behind a NAT.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This being said, I was wondering if there is a way to setup a "many-to-one" configuration for VPN in my Palo Alto that would&amp;nbsp;where I could configure my remote Cisco routers (public DHCP or static) to connect to a single tunnel.&amp;nbsp; I know that I wont get full mesh&amp;nbsp;or nhrp shortcuts, but at this point I am looking to move a few Cisco devices to the Palo Alto to rule out DMVPN itself as being an issue.&amp;nbsp; Is this possible?&amp;nbsp; Can&amp;nbsp; anyone&amp;nbsp;cite a configuration example?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:27:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-cisco-router-ipsec-tunnels-to-single-palo-alto-ipsec/m-p/202908#M59846</guid>
      <dc:creator>mlinsemier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-28T22:27:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Cisco Router IPSec tunnels to single Palo Alto IPSec Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-cisco-router-ipsec-tunnels-to-single-palo-alto-ipsec/m-p/202916#M59847</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you clarify what you mean by single tunnel? I just dont want to steer you in a wrong direction. The PAN can have many IPSEC tunnels going to it on the same local IP address from many remote IP's (not sure if this is what you mean).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/80/pan-os/pan-os/vpns/set-up-site-to-site-vpn" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/80/pan-os/pan-os/vpns/set-up-site-to-site-vpn&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/80/pan-os/pan-os/vpns/site-to-site-vpn-quick-configs" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/80/pan-os/pan-os/vpns/site-to-site-vpn-quick-configs&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Let us know so we can help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 22:58:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-cisco-router-ipsec-tunnels-to-single-palo-alto-ipsec/m-p/202916#M59847</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-28T22:58:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Cisco Router IPSec tunnels to single Palo Alto IPSec Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-cisco-router-ipsec-tunnels-to-single-palo-alto-ipsec/m-p/202918#M59848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What I'm really looking for is the LSVPN type solution without having to have all Palo Alto&amp;nbsp;endpoints.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Right now I have over 100+ telecommuters terminated on one "tunnel" in my Cisco solution.&amp;nbsp; While I know I could create individual site-to-site VPN tunnels for each of these routers, I would rather not configure 100+ individual tunnels&amp;nbsp;in the Palo Alto.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I've done site-to-site before.. just never tried to connect multiple endponts to the same VPN tunnel.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2018 23:06:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-cisco-router-ipsec-tunnels-to-single-palo-alto-ipsec/m-p/202918#M59848</guid>
      <dc:creator>mlinsemier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-28T23:06:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multiple Cisco Router IPSec tunnels to single Palo Alto IPSec Tunnel</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-cisco-router-ipsec-tunnels-to-single-palo-alto-ipsec/m-p/202921#M59849</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/7143"&gt;@mlinsemier&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This would be something really interessting to try out. In theory it should work with global protect (client or satellite configuration) as this is a standard/RFC compliant IPSec VPN connection. But if this really works in a real situation, I have no idea.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you try it, please share your results here in the live community.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Remo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 00:16:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multiple-cisco-router-ipsec-tunnels-to-single-palo-alto-ipsec/m-p/202921#M59849</guid>
      <dc:creator>Remo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-01T00:16:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

