<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Zones in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/zones/m-p/203617#M59983</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;So had the solution for this basically it's the wrong message they sent us they were trying to setup DaaS and they want to know if they have device group named DG-DaaS under the device group DG-AWS_DQA which already exists.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 19:49:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kpotru</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-05T19:49:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Zones</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/zones/m-p/203572#M59967</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to use DG layering to solve DaaS Zone issue??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Can we create a DG-DaaS whose parent will be ‘DG-AWS_DQA’.&lt;BR /&gt;2. Assign Seattle DQT firewall to DG-AWS_DQA&lt;BR /&gt;3. Assign Ashburn n future Chicago to DG-DaaS (since it has DG-AWS_DQA as parent, it will have both DaaS and DQT rules attached)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure if this will work or I’m missing basic configuration that needs to be taken care of.&lt;BR /&gt;any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 16:00:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/zones/m-p/203572#M59967</guid>
      <dc:creator>kpotru</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-05T16:00:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Zones</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/zones/m-p/203613#M59979</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would you be able to provide us with a more detailed explaination and/or a drawing? From what it sounds like is you will have multiple PAN's in AWS, just not sure how they will connect and/or what traffic they will need to pass.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 19:37:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/zones/m-p/203613#M59979</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-05T19:37:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Zones</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/zones/m-p/203617#M59983</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So had the solution for this basically it's the wrong message they sent us they were trying to setup DaaS and they want to know if they have device group named DG-DaaS under the device group DG-AWS_DQA which already exists.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 19:49:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/zones/m-p/203617#M59983</guid>
      <dc:creator>kpotru</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-05T19:49:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Zones</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/zones/m-p/203634#M59989</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/75951"&gt;@kpotru&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, it will work. All existing rules in DG-AWS_DQA will also be applied to the firewall(s) in DG-DaaS. Just make sure that you have the same zones on all firewalls configured in these device-groups or the commit will fail.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2018 20:17:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/zones/m-p/203634#M59989</guid>
      <dc:creator>Remo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-05T20:17:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

