<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Combination Custom IPS Signature in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-custom-ips-signature/m-p/8126#M6002</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;quick question as to combination customer signature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would you please give me your advise please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- one of potential customer want their employee to forcely use company email server (when sending..) not thru the hotmail, gmail etc..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- I found that one of web email service change their URL when&amp;nbsp; it's time to 'write' the email content.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e.g&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://mail2.daum.net/hanmailex/Top.daum?#cmd_ComposeMail"&gt;http://mail2.daum.net/hanmailex/Top.daum?#cmd_ComposeMail&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the custom IPS signature .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. event name : mail1_send&lt;BR /&gt;http-req-uri-path : ﻿hanmailex/Top.daum&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;action : &lt;STRONG&gt;alert&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. event name : mail2_send&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http-req-uri-params : cmd_ComposeMail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;action : &lt;STRONG&gt;alert&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. event name : daum_bocking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in event 3. I chose the 'combination'&amp;nbsp; and add upper 2 signature(mail1_send, mail2_send) in a row.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;action : &lt;STRONG&gt;block.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will this work as my intention?(I failed.. firstly).. e.g) after alerting mail1_send, daum_blocking is populated on the fly, so just accessing that page also denied..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my intention is combined matching event daum_blocking was supposed to generated right &lt;STRONG&gt;after&lt;/STRONG&gt; mail1_send and mail2_send event popped up..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I really apprecaite for this in advaces..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bhlee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-06-27T05:34:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Combination Custom IPS Signature</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-custom-ips-signature/m-p/8126#M6002</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;quick question as to combination customer signature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would you please give me your advise please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- one of potential customer want their employee to forcely use company email server (when sending..) not thru the hotmail, gmail etc..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- I found that one of web email service change their URL when&amp;nbsp; it's time to 'write' the email content.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;e.g&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://mail2.daum.net/hanmailex/Top.daum?#cmd_ComposeMail"&gt;http://mail2.daum.net/hanmailex/Top.daum?#cmd_ComposeMail&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in the custom IPS signature .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. event name : mail1_send&lt;BR /&gt;http-req-uri-path : ﻿hanmailex/Top.daum&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;action : &lt;STRONG&gt;alert&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. event name : mail2_send&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;http-req-uri-params : cmd_ComposeMail&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;action : &lt;STRONG&gt;alert&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. event name : daum_bocking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;in event 3. I chose the 'combination'&amp;nbsp; and add upper 2 signature(mail1_send, mail2_send) in a row.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;action : &lt;STRONG&gt;block.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;will this work as my intention?(I failed.. firstly).. e.g) after alerting mail1_send, daum_blocking is populated on the fly, so just accessing that page also denied..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my intention is combined matching event daum_blocking was supposed to generated right &lt;STRONG&gt;after&lt;/STRONG&gt; mail1_send and mail2_send event popped up..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I really apprecaite for this in advaces..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:34:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-custom-ips-signature/m-p/8126#M6002</guid>
      <dc:creator>bhlee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-27T05:34:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combination Custom IPS Signature</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-custom-ips-signature/m-p/8127#M6003</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your logic is correct in that you should be able to create individual custom signatures and use the combination signature to combine the 2 events together with an and operator. I can't comment whether or not your signatures are good enough to match the event that you want though. Did you also check/uncheck the ordered match criteria to enforce the order in which the signatures are triggered or not? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 05:56:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-custom-ips-signature/m-p/8127#M6003</guid>
      <dc:creator>fredallee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-27T05:56:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Combination Custom IPS Signature</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-custom-ips-signature/m-p/8128#M6004</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes I tried that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;would you please review the test procedure?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you very much.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:14:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/combination-custom-ips-signature/m-p/8128#M6004</guid>
      <dc:creator>bhlee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-27T06:14:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

