<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: speedtest.net giving different results VM vs. PA-220 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206332#M60556</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;thank you for the insight!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but two things;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- VM has only 1 core&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- PA-220 only has one dataplane cpu (or?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so can it really be the reason? also single downloads from other sources use full bandwith. its only speedtest.net that does not...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:37:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>stlenger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-19T13:37:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>speedtest.net giving different results VM vs. PA-220</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206246#M60530</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;after switching from a PA VM on an ESX to a PA-220 i noticed a huge decrease in throughput from speedtest.net - with the VM in vwire or l2 mode i am getting rates consistent with native line speed (around 500Mbit/s down and 250Mbit/s upload). With the PA-220 in either vwire or l2 i am seeing a huge decrease in results in the region of 60 Mbit/s down and 50 Mbit/s upload.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both the VM and PA-220 are on 8.1 (both demo/lab machines), it doesn't matter if av/threat protection is disabled or enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Curious is that other speedtests will show better results even with the PA-220 in place (nperf.net shows same speed regardless of vm/220), also real world applications will utilize full upload bandwith as far as i could test.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My concern is that the PA-220 does handle certain traffic differently or a bottleneck is produced that slows down speedtest.net results considerable.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any input on this would be much appreciated!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 08:01:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206246#M60530</guid>
      <dc:creator>stlenger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-19T08:01:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: speedtest.net giving different results VM vs. PA-220</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206326#M60553</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;speedtest uses a single session to pump as much bandwidth as possible&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The strenght of the hardware platform is that it uses several different cores to process all traffic, allowing it to scan everything in-line without a cost to overall performance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;A side effect is that a single flow may have slower than full system speed performance since it will only be processed on a single core.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Nperf starts multiple sessions so the platform can distribute those evenly and get to maximum capacity.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:09:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206326#M60553</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-19T13:09:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: speedtest.net giving different results VM vs. PA-220</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206332#M60556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thank you for the insight!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but two things;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- VM has only 1 core&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- PA-220 only has one dataplane cpu (or?)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;so can it really be the reason? also single downloads from other sources use full bandwith. its only speedtest.net that does not...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:37:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206332#M60556</guid>
      <dc:creator>stlenger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-19T13:37:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: speedtest.net giving different results VM vs. PA-220</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206338#M60559</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;the PA-220 has 2 DP cores&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;the vm may have a faster core, or use multithreading (or has been set up with a single multicore processor?)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you can track the cpu usage when you run the test to see how the load affects your cores: show running resource-monitor second (run a few times throughout the test)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It may also be the way speedtest sends packets. you could set up a packet-diag filter and track your global counters to see if there's a lot of fragmentation or other 'odd' behavior seen&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:58:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206338#M60559</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-19T13:58:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: speedtest.net giving different results VM vs. PA-220</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206340#M60560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for the input, i will test all that. I allready had a peak into cpu usage and couldn't see any high peaks during those tests.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The curious thing is that:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;a) speedtests with nperf hit 500Mbit/s while speedtest.net hits around 60Mbit/s - both on the PA-220, single Downloads able to utilize full bandwith.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if i put in the factor of having 2 cores and with nperf it will utilitze both cores (on the pa-220) than i should have at least 200-250Mbit/s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;your suggestion with fragmentation or 'odd' behaviour is what i am counting on because everything else utilizes full speed. Its just bugging me that a VM in the same scenario and setup does not have that problem -at all- (i cant see any high utilization on VM either)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:11:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/speedtest-net-giving-different-results-vm-vs-pa-220/m-p/206340#M60560</guid>
      <dc:creator>stlenger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-19T14:11:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

