<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best Practices for Security Policies with App Default and Custom Services in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-practices-for-security-policies-with-app-default-and-custom/m-p/206765#M60655</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I do not have custom applications that I created. The solution I use is to build the policy with all the ports the application will need&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is an example of a policy I have with standard rules and non-standard ports:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 206px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/14370iD8C2C4192F949388/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This way the firewall has to see those applications, ssl or web-browsing, over the specified ports listed. Wile this might not answer your question, I hope to give another way of doing it suggestion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 21:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-21T21:12:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best Practices for Security Policies with App Default and Custom Services</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-practices-for-security-policies-with-app-default-and-custom/m-p/206719#M60651</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have been tasked with converting some legacy security rules from app=any, service=custom object to app=app-ID and service=application-default. However, some of our apps use custom ports over known applications, so straight conversion is not possible.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example. I have a basic rule to allow inbound applications web-browsing (tcp/80) and ssl (tcp/443) to one of our web servers using application-default for the service. This web server also supports HTTP over 8080, and HTTPS over 8443. Instead of creating one rule for the apps/application default, and another rule below it for the apps/custom service objects, I would prefer creating a single application default rule that incompases HTTP over both 80 and 8080, and SSL over 443 and 8443 in order to keep the firewall rules clean.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;To do this, I have created two custom applications objects, web-browsing-8080 using the web-browsing as the parent app over port 8080, and app object ssl-8443 using ssl as the parent app over port 8443. I do not have signatures defined for either custom apps, and we are not decrypting inbound SSL. Understandibly these custom apps are not recognized by the firewalls&amp;nbsp;that otherwise matches web-browsing over 8080 and SSL over 8443. I am new to custom App-IDs so it's likely I'm approaching this wrong.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are the&amp;nbsp;best practices regarding configuring applicaiton rules for both application-default and custom services objects? Is it recommended to create two rules, one with app-default and the second with the app and custom required ports, or is it better to create a single rule using custom app-IDs to enforce application-default?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your time!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:00:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-practices-for-security-policies-with-app-default-and-custom/m-p/206719#M60651</guid>
      <dc:creator>cenduit_jgolden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-21T17:00:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Practices for Security Policies with App Default and Custom Services</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-practices-for-security-policies-with-app-default-and-custom/m-p/206765#M60655</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While I do not have custom applications that I created. The solution I use is to build the policy with all the ports the application will need&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is an example of a policy I have with standard rules and non-standard ports:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image.png" style="width: 206px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/14370iD8C2C4192F949388/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image.png" alt="image.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This way the firewall has to see those applications, ssl or web-browsing, over the specified ports listed. Wile this might not answer your question, I hope to give another way of doing it suggestion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 21:12:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-practices-for-security-policies-with-app-default-and-custom/m-p/206765#M60655</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-21T21:12:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Practices for Security Policies with App Default and Custom Services</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-practices-for-security-policies-with-app-default-and-custom/m-p/206855#M60671</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27580"&gt;@OtakarKlier&lt;/a&gt;s solution makes the most sense, unless you have more specific custom apps: ones you can identify by their behavior, like a recurring header or payload string you can match in a signature&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;if you need lots of these, I'd recommend grouping them in security rules by 'technology' so there's no unexpected port creep (sql over port 80)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:01:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-practices-for-security-policies-with-app-default-and-custom/m-p/206855#M60671</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-22T11:01:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Practices for Security Policies with App Default and Custom Services</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-practices-for-security-policies-with-app-default-and-custom/m-p/206927#M60698</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the feedback Otakar.Klier! I appreciate it! I will discuss this&amp;nbsp;method with my team and update the post if required.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-j&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:58:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/best-practices-for-security-policies-with-app-default-and-custom/m-p/206927#M60698</guid>
      <dc:creator>cenduit_jgolden</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-22T15:58:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

