<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: HA Active/active vwire different location in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-vwire-different-location/m-p/212001#M61813</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;hai &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;how if i do something like this below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Topology 2.png" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/14873i88114958D520799A/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Topology 2.png" alt="Topology 2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what i want to ask are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. is this topology will works for active/active vwire HA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. there is any concern with this topology?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. HA link different building still recommended?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>gabriel_simatupang</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-27T08:11:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>HA Active/active vwire different location</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-vwire-different-location/m-p/210472#M61485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We want to deploy 2 firewall PAN in 2 different location (Building) but same area/complex. Is there any&amp;nbsp;ideal distance for HA link for both firewall? Is it need to directly or i can use via switch?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-center" image-alt="topology.png" style="width: 500px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/14767i0ECD0B057988E4D1/image-size/medium/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="topology.png" alt="topology.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can i deploy this topology? is there any suggest?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 09:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-vwire-different-location/m-p/210472#M61485</guid>
      <dc:creator>gabriel_simatupang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T09:46:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA Active/active vwire different location</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-vwire-different-location/m-p/210559#M61496</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/70083"&gt;@gabriel_simatupang&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes and No.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While your topology would work perfectly fine you would have to utilize aux-1/2 or the management interface for your Control Link, you would then need to configure an interface as an HA interface for your Data Link instead of the hsci interfaces.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Essentially it'll work perfectly fine, you just lose the ability to utilize the hsci interface.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2018 18:50:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-vwire-different-location/m-p/210559#M61496</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-17T18:50:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA Active/active vwire different location</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-vwire-different-location/m-p/212001#M61813</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hai &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;how if i do something like this below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Topology 2.png" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/14873i88114958D520799A/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Topology 2.png" alt="Topology 2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what i want to ask are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. is this topology will works for active/active vwire HA?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. there is any concern with this topology?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. HA link different building still recommended?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 08:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-vwire-different-location/m-p/212001#M61813</guid>
      <dc:creator>gabriel_simatupang</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-27T08:11:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: HA Active/active vwire different location</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-vwire-different-location/m-p/212039#M61826</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/70083"&gt;@gabriel_simatupang&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That topology should would perfectly fine, but I am missing why you need vwire2 at all. From the diagram it looks as though if you lost the router in Building A or B, traffic would traverse to the other switch and out that buildings router right? So at that point simply maintaning vwire 1 and dropping vwire 2 should be sufficient, unless the switch in building A has direct access to the router in building B and I'm just not seeing that in the diagram.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2018 13:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/ha-active-active-vwire-different-location/m-p/212039#M61826</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-27T13:33:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

