<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA specifiations and limitations in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8385#M6191</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for this answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I took a look at Panorama (v4) but I did'nt find this feature :smileyconfused:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone give more details about this feature ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:35:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bdaussin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-13T03:35:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA specifiations and limitations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8380#M6186</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are using Panorama to manage all our PA devices. Depending on our needs, we use plateforms from PA500 to PA5050.&amp;nbsp; Last week we tried to commit a change to a PA500 and we get the message : address group limit exceeded !!!! At the moment we have 253 address groups. So the limit seems to be 250 address groups for a PA500.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Could you give us this kind of limitations for each of you device. I didn't find anything about this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 08:08:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8380#M6186</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdaussin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-11T08:08:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA specifiations and limitations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8381#M6187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Good luck, man. I've asked for stuff like this for years and just get shot down. Their school of thought is just to let the customer experience an outage and then try to figure out why.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:18:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8381#M6187</guid>
      <dc:creator>markjx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-11T23:18:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA specifiations and limitations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8382#M6188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The address group limit for the PA-500 is 250.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 23:40:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8382#M6188</guid>
      <dc:creator>rnitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-11T23:40:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA specifiations and limitations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8383#M6189</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;By using the command "show system state", we are able to have a look at all limitations !!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What i do not anderstand is : Why Panaroma send all objects to Firewall even if these Objects are not used within the policies !! It's really not optimal.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any plan to change this and send only the usefull objects ? It's really not efficient for large companies having to deal with both large and small sites and who want to use Panorama.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 06:45:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8383#M6189</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdaussin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-12T06:45:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA specifiations and limitations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8384#M6190</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe that 4.0 has some functionality around scoping objects to only go to the firewalls which actually use them.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:50:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8384#M6190</guid>
      <dc:creator>markjx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-12T11:50:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA specifiations and limitations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8385#M6191</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for this answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I took a look at Panorama (v4) but I did'nt find this feature :smileyconfused:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone give more details about this feature ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 03:35:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8385#M6191</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdaussin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-13T03:35:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA specifiations and limitations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8386#M6192</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Clarification question. Do you have the firewalls in separate Device Groups on Panorama?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;James&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:34:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8386#M6192</guid>
      <dc:creator>jcostello</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-13T15:34:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA specifiations and limitations</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8387#M6193</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt; Yes we do have device groups. In fact, for all plateforms (except PA500) we use vsys and device-groups.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 07:46:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-specifiations-and-limitations/m-p/8387#M6193</guid>
      <dc:creator>bdaussin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-18T07:46:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

