<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Do BGP and OSPF have to have same router-id on a virtual router ? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/do-bgp-and-ospf-have-to-have-same-router-id-on-a-virtual-router/m-p/223645#M64296</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm running BGP and OSPF on same virtual router&amp;nbsp;and whenever I commit a change, I get the following warning:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;In virtual-router VR_1, BGP router-id 1.1.1.1&amp;nbsp;is different from OSPF router-id 10.1.1.1.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since I'm getting warned about it, I'm thinking&amp;nbsp;it probably is preferred for&amp;nbsp;BGP and OSPF to have same router-id on a given virtual router.&amp;nbsp;It's not causing any issues but I'm really curious about&amp;nbsp;why&amp;nbsp;it keeps warning me about it.&amp;nbsp;anyone has an idea?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:08:19 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MahaBenSassi</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-07-26T11:08:19Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Do BGP and OSPF have to have same router-id on a virtual router ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/do-bgp-and-ospf-have-to-have-same-router-id-on-a-virtual-router/m-p/223645#M64296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm running BGP and OSPF on same virtual router&amp;nbsp;and whenever I commit a change, I get the following warning:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;In virtual-router VR_1, BGP router-id 1.1.1.1&amp;nbsp;is different from OSPF router-id 10.1.1.1.&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Since I'm getting warned about it, I'm thinking&amp;nbsp;it probably is preferred for&amp;nbsp;BGP and OSPF to have same router-id on a given virtual router.&amp;nbsp;It's not causing any issues but I'm really curious about&amp;nbsp;why&amp;nbsp;it keeps warning me about it.&amp;nbsp;anyone has an idea?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:08:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/do-bgp-and-ospf-have-to-have-same-router-id-on-a-virtual-router/m-p/223645#M64296</guid>
      <dc:creator>MahaBenSassi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-26T11:08:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do BGP and OSPF have to have same router-id on a virtual router ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/do-bgp-and-ospf-have-to-have-same-router-id-on-a-virtual-router/m-p/223654#M64298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is no &lt;EM&gt;functional&lt;/EM&gt; requirement for the RID to be the same (hence why this is a warning instead of a commit failure). It's easy to see how this could lead to a confusing situation for administrators, however, which is presumably why the PAN-OS devs decided to display a warning.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2018 12:25:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/do-bgp-and-ospf-have-to-have-same-router-id-on-a-virtual-router/m-p/223654#M64298</guid>
      <dc:creator>9t89m8fu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-26T12:25:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Do BGP and OSPF have to have same router-id on a virtual router ?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/do-bgp-and-ospf-have-to-have-same-router-id-on-a-virtual-router/m-p/223770#M64324</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your reply! I figured it wasn't required by Palo Alto since it's only&amp;nbsp;a warning as you said. I just didn't know why it&amp;nbsp;warns about&amp;nbsp;it. I thought that the warning is leading me toworad following some best practice or something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for your answer again!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 09:34:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/do-bgp-and-ospf-have-to-have-same-router-id-on-a-virtual-router/m-p/223770#M64324</guid>
      <dc:creator>MahaBenSassi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-07-27T09:34:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

