<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Anyone use 6.1.2? Is it stable in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8738#M6440</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;6.1.2 is no longer recommended per TAC.&amp;nbsp; Still having layer 3 lockup issues with 6.1.3 though, so stability is not there yet.&amp;nbsp; My Netscreens fwiw would almost never lockup.&amp;nbsp; I had some units up for 2-3 years without a boot, old firmware/security update recommendations aside.&amp;nbsp; Granted they didn't do as much as the PANs but I also didn't get woken up in the middle of the night every other night and get yelled at&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dusk2dusk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-03-26T12:56:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Anyone use 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8728#M6430</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm pretty interesting in upgrading to this version (on 6.0.8 at the moment). Specifically for the Wildfire email link analysis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anyone upgraded? Is it working fine or have you run into any bugs?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8728#M6430</guid>
      <dc:creator>pmc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-09T19:16:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone one 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8729#M6431</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi PMC,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;6.1.2 is recommended release. It has one issue related to Ipsec, it doesnt mean it will affect your firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hardik Shah&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 19:25:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8729#M6431</guid>
      <dc:creator>hshah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-09T19:25:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone one 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8730#M6432</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi PMC,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my some of client using 6.1.2 and its look like good.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thnx&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Satish&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 03:59:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8730#M6432</guid>
      <dc:creator>Satish</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-10T03:59:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone one 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8731#M6433</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi PMC,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We had a problem on Panorama M-100 with the log messages received from the firewall.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Panorama discarded all the log messages so we had to roll-back to version 6.0.8.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 07:54:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8731#M6433</guid>
      <dc:creator>GobiernodeNavarra</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-10T07:54:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone one 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8732#M6434</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am having a problem with IPSec (Satellite Device) as already reported. Downgrading to 6.1 resolved the IPSec problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2015 14:33:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8732#M6434</guid>
      <dc:creator>gafrol</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-10T14:33:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone one 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8733#M6435</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Me too.&amp;nbsp; Detailed here &lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/message/50520"&gt;6.1.2 LSVPN/VPN Hang - Reboot Required&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's the official response???&amp;nbsp; I'll open a support case too&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2015 14:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8733#M6435</guid>
      <dc:creator>dusk2dusk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-12T14:36:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone use 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8734#M6436</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using 6.1.2 on my PA-200.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, all traffics are traversing FW.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One thing I'm concerning is that mp has some kind of memory leak.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can't generate TSF.(it will be empty tgz file)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As you see below, my swap memory is 0k free.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;admin@PA-200(active)&amp;gt; show system resources&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;top - 11:18:32 up 38 days,&amp;nbsp; 1:04,&amp;nbsp; 1 user,&amp;nbsp; load average: 2.10, 2.34, 1.87&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tasks:&amp;nbsp; 98 total,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2 running,&amp;nbsp; 96 sleeping,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 stopped,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0 zombie&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cpu(s): 51.0%us,&amp;nbsp; 1.9%sy,&amp;nbsp; 4.6%ni, 42.0%id,&amp;nbsp; 0.5%wa,&amp;nbsp; 0.0%hi,&amp;nbsp; 0.0%si,&amp;nbsp; 0.0%st&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mem:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2575620k total,&amp;nbsp; 2009260k used,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 566360k free,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 71396k buffers&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Swap:&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7992k total,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7992k used,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0k free,&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 518104k cached&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 02:19:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8734#M6436</guid>
      <dc:creator>emr_1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-13T02:19:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone use 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8735#M6437</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi &lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"&gt;Hardik,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3b3b3b; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; font-size: 13px;"&gt;Could you please share the information about the issue with IPSec in 6.1.2?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 06:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8735#M6437</guid>
      <dc:creator>faust</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-13T06:28:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone use 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8736#M6438</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello &lt;STRONG style="font-size: 11.6999998092651px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; color: #3b3b3b;"&gt;&lt;A _jive_internal="true" class="jiveTT-hover-user jive-username-link" data-avatarid="1246" data-externalid="" data-presence="null" data-userid="25053" data-username="faust" href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/people/faust" style="padding: 0 3px 0 0; font-weight: inherit; font-style: inherit; font-size: 1.1em; font-family: inherit; color: #006595;"&gt;faust,&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No specific issues have been identified so far with IPSec. It's a good&amp;nbsp; stable OS.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 06:31:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8736#M6438</guid>
      <dc:creator>HULK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-13T06:31:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone use 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8737#M6439</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can confirm same problem as EMR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally I have much biger problem with memory leak and accidental reboot of my PA200.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's finally recognised by support as a &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"&gt;bug id is 71828 will be fixed in &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"&gt;6.1.4 release.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"&gt;I'd recommend You to wait until 6.1.4 will be released.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 12.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif;"&gt;Slawek&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:40:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8737#M6439</guid>
      <dc:creator>_slv_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-13T10:40:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Anyone use 6.1.2? Is it stable</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8738#M6440</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;6.1.2 is no longer recommended per TAC.&amp;nbsp; Still having layer 3 lockup issues with 6.1.3 though, so stability is not there yet.&amp;nbsp; My Netscreens fwiw would almost never lockup.&amp;nbsp; I had some units up for 2-3 years without a boot, old firmware/security update recommendations aside.&amp;nbsp; Granted they didn't do as much as the PANs but I also didn't get woken up in the middle of the night every other night and get yelled at&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2015 12:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/anyone-use-6-1-2-is-it-stable/m-p/8738#M6440</guid>
      <dc:creator>dusk2dusk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-03-26T12:56:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

