<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to use Aggregate interfaces LACP? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224676#M64489</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks BPry and JoeAndreini.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my production environment. The PA device will place between 2 x Juniper&amp;nbsp;SSG140 (formed in HA) and 1 x Cisco 2960 switch like below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;internal &amp;lt;--&amp;gt; 2960 &amp;lt;--&amp;gt; PA &amp;lt;--&amp;gt; 2xSSG140(HA) &amp;lt;--&amp;gt; internet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My plan is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Aggregate interfaces connect to 2 ports in 2960.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2.&amp;nbsp;Aggregate interfaces with eth1/1 connect to 1st SSG140. eth1/2 connect to 2nd SSG140.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do you think LACP is going to work with those network device?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 01:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jeremylo</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-03T01:36:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to use Aggregate interfaces LACP?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224516#M64455</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Testing a PA-220. Create an Aggregate group with 2 interfaces.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both interfaces connect to an unmanaged D-Link switch. And it connected to the company network.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The aggregate interface can up when LACP is not enable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After enable LACP. It down and hover the mouse on it show below info:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ethernet1/2: not active (negotiation failed)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ethernet1/1: not active (peer not detected)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any prerequisite&amp;nbsp;to use LACP?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 06:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224516#M64455</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeremylo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-02T06:27:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to use Aggregate interfaces LACP?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224559#M64462</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Your switch must support it and be configured as such.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;An unmanaged switch would not have that capability.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 11:44:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224559#M64462</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeAndreini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-02T11:44:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to use Aggregate interfaces LACP?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224572#M64466</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/92212"&gt;@jeremylo&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/83021"&gt;@JoeAndreini&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;already stated any unmanaged switch isn't going to work with LACP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol) only has a few real advantages, but they are actually pretty important in most enviroments over a standard LAG configuration.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- The failover will always occur automatically: When a link fails, even if a MC is between the devices, the peer will remove a link from the aggregate group because it fails to negotiate with the LACP peer. Major advantage depending on how your network is setup.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Since this is a control protocol that negotiates the connection, the device can confirm that the other end can handle link aggregation before bringing up the interfaces. This helps prevent miscabling causing a loop or similar issues.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 13:30:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224572#M64466</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-02T13:30:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to use Aggregate interfaces LACP?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224676#M64489</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks BPry and JoeAndreini.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my production environment. The PA device will place between 2 x Juniper&amp;nbsp;SSG140 (formed in HA) and 1 x Cisco 2960 switch like below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;internal &amp;lt;--&amp;gt; 2960 &amp;lt;--&amp;gt; PA &amp;lt;--&amp;gt; 2xSSG140(HA) &amp;lt;--&amp;gt; internet&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My plan is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Aggregate interfaces connect to 2 ports in 2960.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2.&amp;nbsp;Aggregate interfaces with eth1/1 connect to 1st SSG140. eth1/2 connect to 2nd SSG140.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Do you think LACP is going to work with those network device?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 01:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224676#M64489</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeremylo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-03T01:36:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to use Aggregate interfaces LACP?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224716#M64493</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;your "external" aggregate interface will not work as you expect, it will need to be two separate interfaces, one to each SSG.&amp;nbsp; Or there will need to eb a switch between the NGFW and the SSG(s)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:07:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224716#M64493</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeAndreini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-03T11:07:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to use Aggregate interfaces LACP?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224718#M64495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The 2960 though will be fine with Etherchannel for LACP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could use the 2960 on both sides of the PA with seperate VLANS for internal and external traffic (but it's not ideal).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rob&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:51:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/how-to-use-aggregate-interfaces-lacp/m-p/224718#M64495</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobinClayton</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-03T11:51:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

