<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Source Users and Source Users Reported as &amp;quot;None&amp;quot; By FW in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-users-and-source-users-reported-as-quot-none-quot-by-fw/m-p/226352#M65165</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm on version 8.1.2,&amp;nbsp; in ACC tab I do have a User Activity "widget" or pane that shows Source User, Destination User, Bytes, Sessions, Threats, Content, URLs and Apps. Always the Source User, presents "None" for Source User and also I see "None" for the Destination User with the most number bytes&amp;nbsp; sent (or could be received). I do have valid user names (such as jdoe) for Destination User but:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Why do I see Source User reported as None (and not a valid user name)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Why the the first (the entit with thight transfered bytes) Destination Users is alwasy reported as None?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for taking a shot at answering these questions (in advance).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NetOverLord</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-07T18:57:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Source Users and Source Users Reported as "None" By FW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-users-and-source-users-reported-as-quot-none-quot-by-fw/m-p/226352#M65165</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm on version 8.1.2,&amp;nbsp; in ACC tab I do have a User Activity "widget" or pane that shows Source User, Destination User, Bytes, Sessions, Threats, Content, URLs and Apps. Always the Source User, presents "None" for Source User and also I see "None" for the Destination User with the most number bytes&amp;nbsp; sent (or could be received). I do have valid user names (such as jdoe) for Destination User but:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Why do I see Source User reported as None (and not a valid user name)?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Why the the first (the entit with thight transfered bytes) Destination Users is alwasy reported as None?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for taking a shot at answering these questions (in advance).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 18:57:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-users-and-source-users-reported-as-quot-none-quot-by-fw/m-p/226352#M65165</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetOverLord</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-07T18:57:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Source Users and Source Users Reported as "None" By FW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-users-and-source-users-reported-as-quot-none-quot-by-fw/m-p/226388#M65174</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24964"&gt;@NetOverLord&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The reason your seeing 'None' is because the firewall doesn't having a mapping for the source/destination address. One would expect that the majority of traffic in your average network would be None, as the destination address wouldn't have a user mapping.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The same holds true for the the source-user mapping. If you allow traffic in from the outside users, say if hosting a web server, you wouldn't have source-user information (you could but only in a relatively limited situation). Guest traffic is also a huge source &amp;nbsp;of source-user 'None' traffic if you have that on your network, or Windows updates running in the evenings once the user-id mapping has aged-out.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There's a tone of reasons why this would be the case, and these are only a few examples. Really it would be up to you to analyze your logs files and see what exactly is being logged and where the traffic is coming from.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2018 03:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-users-and-source-users-reported-as-quot-none-quot-by-fw/m-p/226388#M65174</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-08T03:21:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Source Users and Source Users Reported as "None" By FW</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-users-and-source-users-reported-as-quot-none-quot-by-fw/m-p/235993#M67640</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks BPry.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 14:16:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/source-users-and-source-users-reported-as-quot-none-quot-by-fw/m-p/235993#M67640</guid>
      <dc:creator>NetOverLord</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-18T14:16:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

