<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Palo-Cisco VPN Logs in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226780#M65287</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/91200"&gt;@welly_59&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly. With interesting traffic the Cisco device will actually attempt to fully bring up the tunnel.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 02:50:36 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-11T02:50:36Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Palo-Cisco VPN Logs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226688#M65258</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Im setting up a s2s vpn between a Palo and a Cisco ASR. The GUI is showing it all as up - green lights and ike tunnels. But the logs are showing the below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;IKEv2 child SA negotiation is failed message lacks KE payload&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sending traffic down the vpn yet so i am unable to ascertain if this is important message or not (would rather know it works before i tell my boss it is working!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 09:52:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226688#M65258</guid>
      <dc:creator>welly_59</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-10T09:52:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo-Cisco VPN Logs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226730#M65278</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/91200"&gt;@welly_59&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cisco won't really bring up the tunnel on its end until you have interested traffic attempting to navigate the tunnel.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:42:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226730#M65278</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-10T14:42:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo-Cisco VPN Logs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226743#M65281</link>
      <description>So if I get on a device within my subnet specified in the proxy-I’d and generate some traffic the message logs should change?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2018 19:00:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226743#M65281</guid>
      <dc:creator>welly_59</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-10T19:00:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo-Cisco VPN Logs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226780#M65287</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/91200"&gt;@welly_59&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly. With interesting traffic the Cisco device will actually attempt to fully bring up the tunnel.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 02:50:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226780#M65287</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-11T02:50:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo-Cisco VPN Logs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226799#M65294</link>
      <description>I’ve looked a bit deeper into this. Run a pcap while restarting the vpn, and then looking at active sa’s on the cli. The child sa’s matching the proxy ids are up and seem to be fine.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;This weird message regarding no ke message is for a third child sa initiated by the Cisco device. Might be a issue with the crypto map their side</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2018 11:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226799#M65294</guid>
      <dc:creator>welly_59</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-11T11:37:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Palo-Cisco VPN Logs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226981#M65331</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Got to the bottom of this. The Cisco was actually using a route-based VPN. I had been expecting a policy-based VPN so had configured Proxy-ID's on the Palo Alto.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have removed the Proxy-ID's from the config and the tunnel; has stayed up but the log errors have stopped&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2018 20:49:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/palo-cisco-vpn-logs/m-p/226981#M65331</guid>
      <dc:creator>welly_59</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-13T20:49:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

