<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: high latency after HA failover in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/227914#M65561</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24977"&gt;@Carracido&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then I really wouldn't expect that much of a delay unless your hitting an issue with STP. Have you verified that you aren't just hitting a normal delay as the network reconverges following the failover?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-22T17:03:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>high latency after HA failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/227903#M65556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello team,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have an HA active/passive with a couple of PA-3250. After failover from active to passive there are a high latency for all the connections and some Http/https sessions cannot be established. I see in the traffic logs many aged out sessions and tcp-rst-from-server and also tcp-rst-from-client. After one minute aprox. the system gets stable. Is this expected behavior?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks and Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcos.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 15:38:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/227903#M65556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carracido</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-22T15:38:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: high latency after HA failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/227910#M65557</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24977"&gt;@Carracido&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It can be expected behaviour depending on the configuration.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You aren't by chance using LACP aggregates for anything are you?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 16:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/227910#M65557</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-22T16:43:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: high latency after HA failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/227913#M65560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi BPry,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for you answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;No I´m not using LCAP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Marcos.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:01:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/227913#M65560</guid>
      <dc:creator>Carracido</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-22T17:01:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: high latency after HA failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/227914#M65561</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/24977"&gt;@Carracido&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then I really wouldn't expect that much of a delay unless your hitting an issue with STP. Have you verified that you aren't just hitting a normal delay as the network reconverges following the failover?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/227914#M65561</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-22T17:03:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: high latency after HA failover</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/566512#M114485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi i'm experiencing same issue here but i have 1 lacp connection. How should it lead to high latencies?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2023 14:42:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/high-latency-after-ha-failover/m-p/566512#M114485</guid>
      <dc:creator>robertocol</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-21T14:42:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

