<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Multi-vsys mismatches with peer in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228165#M65620</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Joe! It worked, it was really that simple. Strange behaviour..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I have create the new virtual system and associated the interfaces. I have another question..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wish to use one single phisical interface as the outside interface for any virtual systems. How can I do that? Leave that to the first vsys and then point at that with the virtual routers on the other vsys?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FabrizioPoggio</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-08-24T12:05:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Multi-vsys mismatches with peer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228144#M65612</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello guys,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to create additional virtual system on a 3020 cluster. Said that I have installed a regular multi-vsys license, I have enabled the multi-vsys capability (Device-Setup-General) on both devices.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now on both of them the HA state (active-passive) is SUSPENDED with the "multi-vsys mismatches with peer" error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But apart from enabling the capability I haven't done nothing else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The PanOS is 8.0.10.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:23:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228144#M65612</guid>
      <dc:creator>FabrizioPoggio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T09:23:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-vsys mismatches with peer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228151#M65613</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Edit: what was written here was useless ...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 15:17:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228151#M65613</guid>
      <dc:creator>Remo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T15:17:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-vsys mismatches with peer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228154#M65616</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, I even tried a "commit force" on both just to be sure&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:59:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228154#M65616</guid>
      <dc:creator>FabrizioPoggio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T09:59:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-vsys mismatches with peer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228161#M65617</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Have you tried rebooting or to make them functional from operational commands?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In my experience, when multi-vsys is enabled on an online HA pair this hapens every time - I suspect they suspend themselves due to the mismatch after the first is set to multi-vsys&amp;nbsp;and don't automatically check again after the second is set.&amp;nbsp; Usually manually un-suspending them works for me.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 11:08:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228161#M65617</guid>
      <dc:creator>JoeAndreini</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T11:08:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-vsys mismatches with peer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228165#M65620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Joe! It worked, it was really that simple. Strange behaviour..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I have create the new virtual system and associated the interfaces. I have another question..&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wish to use one single phisical interface as the outside interface for any virtual systems. How can I do that? Leave that to the first vsys and then point at that with the virtual routers on the other vsys?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 12:05:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228165#M65620</guid>
      <dc:creator>FabrizioPoggio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T12:05:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-vsys mismatches with peer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228202#M65630</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/53067"&gt;@FabrizioPoggio&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One vsys needs to be associated with one interface - or subinterface. But what you are actually searching (as I assume) is to use only one interface for all vsys without subinterfaces, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In this case, the shared gateway feature could be something for you:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/80/pan-os/pan-os/virtual-systems/shared-gateway" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/80/pan-os/pan-os/virtual-systems/shared-gateway&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/How-to-Set-Up-Shared-Gateway-and-Inter-VSYS/ta-p/57370" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Configuration-Articles/How-to-Set-Up-Shared-Gateway-and-Inter-VSYS/ta-p/57370&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/80/pan-os/pan-os/virtual-systems/configure-a-shared-gateway" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/80/pan-os/pan-os/virtual-systems/configure-a-shared-gateway&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:12:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228202#M65630</guid>
      <dc:creator>Remo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T16:12:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Multi-vsys mismatches with peer</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228208#M65632</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you so much, remo&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 16:01:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/multi-vsys-mismatches-with-peer/m-p/228208#M65632</guid>
      <dc:creator>FabrizioPoggio</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-08-24T16:01:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

