<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New PA820 replacing PA500 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-pa820-replacing-pa500/m-p/230051#M66146</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/23401"&gt;@cdcirexx&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Massive improvements when using the PA-820 over the PA-500. Keep in mind that on the 500 if you had Threat Prevention enabled between intervlan traffic you were limited to 100Mbps of throughput; this goes all the way up to 610Mbps on the 820. Honestly I wouldn't have attempted your current configuration with a PA-500, the PA-820 would make this much more servicable and is actually advisable for smaller offices.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's a really nice comparision between the two &lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/apps/productcompare/createpdf?language=en_US&amp;amp;corename=productcompare&amp;amp;q=product_id:%22pa-500%22%20OR%20%22pa-820%22&amp;amp;rows=3&amp;amp;json.nl=map&amp;amp;sort=position+asc&amp;amp;wt=json&amp;amp;chosen=pa-500,pa-820" target="_blank"&gt;HERE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-07T19:30:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New PA820 replacing PA500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-pa820-replacing-pa500/m-p/230021#M66138</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just wanted to get some ideas on performance of the PA820, right now our PA500 is acting as a router/gateway to internal lan, and will be migrating to the pa820, so if I were to keep the settings, like just migrate over the configs, will the pa820 perform better as a router, cause currently some users are complaining of slow intervlan performance with the pa500, has anyone gone through a similar migration, thanks in advanced.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 17:15:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-pa820-replacing-pa500/m-p/230021#M66138</guid>
      <dc:creator>cdcirexx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-07T17:15:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New PA820 replacing PA500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-pa820-replacing-pa500/m-p/230051#M66146</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/23401"&gt;@cdcirexx&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Massive improvements when using the PA-820 over the PA-500. Keep in mind that on the 500 if you had Threat Prevention enabled between intervlan traffic you were limited to 100Mbps of throughput; this goes all the way up to 610Mbps on the 820. Honestly I wouldn't have attempted your current configuration with a PA-500, the PA-820 would make this much more servicable and is actually advisable for smaller offices.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's a really nice comparision between the two &lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/apps/productcompare/createpdf?language=en_US&amp;amp;corename=productcompare&amp;amp;q=product_id:%22pa-500%22%20OR%20%22pa-820%22&amp;amp;rows=3&amp;amp;json.nl=map&amp;amp;sort=position+asc&amp;amp;wt=json&amp;amp;chosen=pa-500,pa-820" target="_blank"&gt;HERE&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-pa820-replacing-pa500/m-p/230051#M66146</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-07T19:30:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New PA820 replacing PA500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-pa820-replacing-pa500/m-p/230056#M66150</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply Bpry, yeah that's what made management decide to go with pa820, after seeing the comparison when we were shopping around for a replacement firewall, we just basically didn't size up our firewall first hand, that's why the slow intervlan.&amp;nbsp; We are a somewhat small shop about 70 users, with a 50mb upload/download, so we got room to grow with the pa820.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2018 19:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-pa820-replacing-pa500/m-p/230056#M66150</guid>
      <dc:creator>cdcirexx</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-07T19:59:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

