<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: 1Gbps support for PA-500 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/1gbps-support-for-pa-500/m-p/232410#M66664</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/81365"&gt;@qd_056&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the current state, the PA-500 would be a bottleneck for the 1GB network since as you have correctly identified the maximum throughput with threat prevention enabled is 100Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The next step up would be the PA-820 or PA-850 which would give you 610 and 780 Mbps threat prevention throughput respectively. However, to utilise the full 1GB link I would recommend the PA-3220 which gives you 2.2Gbps threat prevention throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luke.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:07:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LukeBullimore</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-09-26T09:07:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>1Gbps support for PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/1gbps-support-for-pa-500/m-p/232380#M66660</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We decided to upgrade our internet line to 1Gbps from current 100Mbps and now we are using PA-500.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As PA-500's Threat prevention throughput is 100Mbps, does it mean we only have 100Mbps（transmission speed） even the PA-500's interface capacity is 1000Mbps？&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Qu Dong&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 07:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/1gbps-support-for-pa-500/m-p/232380#M66660</guid>
      <dc:creator>qd_056</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-26T07:01:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1Gbps support for PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/1gbps-support-for-pa-500/m-p/232410#M66664</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/81365"&gt;@qd_056&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In the current state, the PA-500 would be a bottleneck for the 1GB network since as you have correctly identified the maximum throughput with threat prevention enabled is 100Mbps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The next step up would be the PA-820 or PA-850 which would give you 610 and 780 Mbps threat prevention throughput respectively. However, to utilise the full 1GB link I would recommend the PA-3220 which gives you 2.2Gbps threat prevention throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Luke.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2018 09:07:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/1gbps-support-for-pa-500/m-p/232410#M66664</guid>
      <dc:creator>LukeBullimore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-26T09:07:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1Gbps support for PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/1gbps-support-for-pa-500/m-p/232656#M66733</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Luke.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Does that mean if want to get 100% benefit from the 1G (or 3G)internet line on a PA product, the product we choose at least&amp;nbsp;needs the "Threat prevention throughput" is &amp;gt;= the bandwidth?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Coming 1 more concern here, how do we evaluate whether an FW product needs to be upgraded? any best practice？&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 08:28:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/1gbps-support-for-pa-500/m-p/232656#M66733</guid>
      <dc:creator>qd_056</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-27T08:28:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: 1Gbps support for PA-500</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/1gbps-support-for-pa-500/m-p/232704#M66757</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I usually look at all the specs and use the lowest numbers as my rule of thumb, even if not using that feature (who knows what the future holds). I would keep an eye on your CPU's and user feedback. They are usually the best indicators.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 14:10:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/1gbps-support-for-pa-500/m-p/232704#M66757</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-09-27T14:10:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

