<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA-3020 vs PA-850 in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/233940#M67057</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are doing ssl decrypt, i would say compare the 850 to the 3220, its the newer model that replaces the 3020. I had a similar debate a while ago between those two, 3020 and 850, and onky chose the 3020 since it had more ethernet ports and didnt require gbics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just my thoughts.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 15:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-04T15:43:37Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA-3020 vs PA-850</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/233681#M66982</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am in the process to purchase a new pair of firewalls (in active/passive setup), but I am stuck in selecting PA-3020 or PA-850.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;While the tech specifications are similar, the cost is not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Additionally, the PA-3020 is around since a while, so I am more oriented to purchase the PA-850.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is going to serve a 350-people office, and I will need to use virtual-routers, PAN-DB, Threat Prevention and WildFire.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any suggestion ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AM&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2018 14:59:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/233681#M66982</guid>
      <dc:creator>AMoretti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-03T14:59:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-3020 vs PA-850</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/233888#M67041</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are in the same situation. So if you had no&amp;nbsp;issues with the PA-3020 and the performance limitations (like max sessions and througput) it can be an option to look at the PA-850. But the PA-850 is weaker in some points:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;New Connections per second: 50.000 (3020) vs. 9.500 (850) - huge difference if you ask me&lt;BR /&gt;Maximum session: 250.000 (3020) vs. 197.000 (850) - big difference if you ask me&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Security Rules: 2.500 (3020) vs. 1.500 (850) - big difference if you ask me, i mean 1000 rules more at the PA-3020&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And it goes down the hole datasheet. The only points the PA-850 is better, in my opinion, is USER-ID Mapping in the Dataplane and SSL Decryption Performance (except for HSM Support).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you didn't made it yet, take a look: &lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/products/product-comparison.html?chosen=pa-3020,pa-850" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/products/product-comparison.html?chosen=pa-3020,pa-850&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So if your envirement is in this performance area maybe a PA-850 can work. But as i say, we are in the same situation right now and we are going for the PA-3220. But this is because we need more performance now.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 11:30:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/233888#M67041</guid>
      <dc:creator>markus_w</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-04T11:30:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-3020 vs PA-850</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/233940#M67057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you are doing ssl decrypt, i would say compare the 850 to the 3220, its the newer model that replaces the 3020. I had a similar debate a while ago between those two, 3020 and 850, and onky chose the 3020 since it had more ethernet ports and didnt require gbics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just my thoughts.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2018 15:43:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/233940#M67057</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-04T15:43:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-3020 vs PA-850</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/235498#M67520</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Markus !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:45:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/235498#M67520</guid>
      <dc:creator>AMoretti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-16T14:45:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-3020 vs PA-850</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/235499#M67521</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks Otakar !&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2018 14:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-3020-vs-pa-850/m-p/235499#M67521</guid>
      <dc:creator>AMoretti</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-16T14:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

