<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Globalprotect pre-login split tunnel best practise? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-pre-login-split-tunnel-best-practise/m-p/235007#M67371</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess it depends on your companies requirements. We are under so many complance acronyms that split-tunneling is a no no.&amp;nbsp; I'm sure there are use cases where split-tunneling is a good thing. However my approach is what's wrong wtih tunneling everything back to home base? This way all traffic is scanned and inspected by this wonderfully complex and expensive device called a PAN.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-11T19:30:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Globalprotect pre-login split tunnel best practise?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-pre-login-split-tunnel-best-practise/m-p/234983#M67367</link>
      <description>What is the recommended config for the split tunnel for pre-login? Our users when authenticated are fully tunnelled back to us.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:06:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-pre-login-split-tunnel-best-practise/m-p/234983#M67367</guid>
      <dc:creator>welly_59</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T19:06:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Globalprotect pre-login split tunnel best practise?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-pre-login-split-tunnel-best-practise/m-p/235007#M67371</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess it depends on your companies requirements. We are under so many complance acronyms that split-tunneling is a no no.&amp;nbsp; I'm sure there are use cases where split-tunneling is a good thing. However my approach is what's wrong wtih tunneling everything back to home base? This way all traffic is scanned and inspected by this wonderfully complex and expensive device called a PAN.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2018 19:30:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/globalprotect-pre-login-split-tunnel-best-practise/m-p/235007#M67371</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-11T19:30:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

