<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Panorama snmp trap in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-snmp-trap/m-p/238973#M68453</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I hate snmp overall aswell, however in larger enterprise its not always that easy to decide what monitor equipment to use &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But i will try to do it from each firewall&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>hbalzac</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-07T20:49:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Panorama snmp trap</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-snmp-trap/m-p/238940#M68446</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;My idea was first to setup panorama to monitor the logs for critical and then send snmp trap.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But from what i can see from the PA mibs, there are no way for panorama to send info in the trap about the device? So all i see in the trap is the panorama ip. Is there any way around this? Or is maybe best practise to trap from the individual device?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 18:45:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-snmp-trap/m-p/238940#M68446</guid>
      <dc:creator>hbalzac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-07T18:45:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Panorama snmp trap</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-snmp-trap/m-p/238958#M68449</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/90411"&gt;@hbalzac&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So full disclosure, I&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;hate&lt;/STRONG&gt; snmp traps with a passion and find them very old school when other alerting methods exist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally speaking I would only have the Panorama appliance send traps for Panorama, I wouldn't have it send alerts about attached devices. That being siad, their is a ton of additional information present in the email alerts if you set this up for emails instead of SNMP traps. I would also probably recommend setting up alerts on the individual firewalls as well, instead of simply monitoring Panorama for all devices. I tend to find it a little cleaner and it doesn't add much overhead at all.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:13:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-snmp-trap/m-p/238958#M68449</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-07T20:13:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Panorama snmp trap</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-snmp-trap/m-p/238973#M68453</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I hate snmp overall aswell, however in larger enterprise its not always that easy to decide what monitor equipment to use &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But i will try to do it from each firewall&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2018 20:49:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/panorama-snmp-trap/m-p/238973#M68453</guid>
      <dc:creator>hbalzac</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-07T20:49:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

