<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Management access for permitted IPs in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240144#M68801</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One approach is to use the PAN itself to secure the management interface. Meaning you put the management interface into a zone that is managed by the PAN so then you can use all sorts of different options to secure the management interface, i.e. source/destination IP, zone, user-id, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-16T15:34:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Management access for permitted IPs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240086#M68770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i am trying to add 10/8 as premitted IP subnet in mgmt interface but it seems to not work? anyone else has experienced this?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 00:29:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240086#M68770</guid>
      <dc:creator>josggf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-16T00:29:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Management access for permitted IPs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240097#M68776</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I do not restrict management to specific ip’s but it’s my understanding that this option is for host addresses, not entire ranges.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:20:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240097#M68776</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mick_Ball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-16T07:20:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Management access for permitted IPs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240099#M68778</link>
      <description>I will recheck but I think it works for a /24</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 07:25:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240099#M68778</guid>
      <dc:creator>josggf</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-16T07:25:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Management access for permitted IPs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240144#M68801</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One approach is to use the PAN itself to secure the management interface. Meaning you put the management interface into a zone that is managed by the PAN so then you can use all sorts of different options to secure the management interface, i.e. source/destination IP, zone, user-id, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 15:34:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240144#M68801</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-16T15:34:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Management access for permitted IPs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240155#M68811</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;yes good point &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27580"&gt;@OtakarKlier&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;but our policies only permit out of band management.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;perhaps &lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/89373"&gt;@josggf&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;has the management interface connected to the user or trusted LAN and therefore your suggestion would be best.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 16:37:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240155#M68811</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mick_Ball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-16T16:37:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Management access for permitted IPs</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240210#M68843</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/89373"&gt;@josggf&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What's the point of even putting in permitted IPs if you're enabling an entire /8 network? Regardless, 8.1.* and 8.0.* will allow you to do this perfectly fine without complaint, are you trying to actually include '10/8' or '10.0.0.0/8', because it would need to be the second option.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2018 22:41:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/management-access-for-permitted-ips/m-p/240210#M68843</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-16T22:41:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

