<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: app not show on application field on policy based forwarding in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/241176#M69092</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Cool, thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>mss.support</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-26T18:03:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>app not show on application field on policy based forwarding</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/240778#M68974</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;what is the reason one app not show applications field/&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We need create one policy with one app that show on applications, but when I check in PBF the app is not show.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The app name "supremo" use default port tcp/443 and&amp;nbsp;Implicitly Uses:&amp;nbsp; web-browsing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the reason ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:07:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/240778#M68974</guid>
      <dc:creator>mss.support</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-21T21:07:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: app not show on application field on policy based forwarding</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/240786#M68976</link>
      <description>The reason is you can't use the full list of apps in PBF that exist in applipedia. It's a misnomer that you can use apps like Facebook or Netflix and "route" those packets.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 21:52:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/240786#M68976</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-21T21:52:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: app not show on application field on policy based forwarding</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/240787#M68977</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Routing decision has to be made based on first packet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First packet in TCP based application is SYN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on SYN it is not possible to identify application yet and make routing decision.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example in case of web-browsing application is identified on 5th packet.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SYN - client to server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;SYN ACK - server to client&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ACK - client to server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;HTTP GET - client to server&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And now when website sends back website Palo shifts application to web-browsing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2018 22:01:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/240787#M68977</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raido_Rattameister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-21T22:01:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: app not show on application field on policy based forwarding</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/241176#M69092</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Cool, thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 18:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/241176#M69092</guid>
      <dc:creator>mss.support</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-26T18:03:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: app not show on application field on policy based forwarding</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/241185#M69094</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/20785"&gt;@mss.support&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cool, thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Trust me it was a bummer when I found this as well.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Application routing" devices like touted in SD-WAN solutions / Meraki, Viptela, or even Riverbed's SteelConnect tout application based routing.&amp;nbsp; I've not really delved into these solutions, and can't understand how there isn't some sort of a hit as application shifts occur which could change a routed path.&amp;nbsp; That said I would love it if Palo could use a similar solution.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:56:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-not-show-on-application-field-on-policy-based-forwarding/m-p/241185#M69094</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-26T20:56:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

