<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dynamic NAT IP &amp;amp; PORT with STUN in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241574#M69173</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27580"&gt;@OtakarKlier&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes I see my packet going through my rules with the stun application on the google-meet port 19302 but 0 received packet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>David7660</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-29T12:57:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dynamic NAT IP &amp; PORT with STUN</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241255#M69104</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is anyone already configured it ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We want to use STUN but the NAT seems to be a problem.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;David,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 09:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241255#M69104</guid>
      <dc:creator>David7660</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-27T09:31:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic NAT IP &amp; PORT with STUN</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241358#M69122</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/100455"&gt;@David7660&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is how most people have their browsing traffic nat'd. Because the firewall keeps all of the traffic together in a session, STUN traffic should not be an issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is also how I've configured my firewalls, and none have issues with Hangouts or other messaging apps because of it.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2018 18:28:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241358#M69122</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-27T18:28:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic NAT IP &amp; PORT with STUN</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241449#M69145</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I thought the same thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But when we test it, we never receive the bindResponse. I don't know why.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My rules is&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;LAN to EXT with STUN application to any port to the URLs stun.l.google.com,&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;stun1.l.google.com,&amp;nbsp;stun2.l.google.com,&amp;nbsp;stun3.l.google.com,&amp;nbsp;stun4.l.google.com&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 14:02:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241449#M69145</guid>
      <dc:creator>David7660</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-28T14:02:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic NAT IP &amp; PORT with STUN</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241505#M69156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any drop or denies in the unified logs? Also is it picking up on the application STUN?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please advise,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 20:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241505#M69156</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-28T20:55:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dynamic NAT IP &amp; PORT with STUN</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241574#M69173</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27580"&gt;@OtakarKlier&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes I see my packet going through my rules with the stun application on the google-meet port 19302 but 0 received packet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:57:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dynamic-nat-ip-amp-port-with-stun/m-p/241574#M69173</guid>
      <dc:creator>David7660</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-29T12:57:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

