<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Maintenance Page redirection via Palo Alto? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241739#M69221</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/56398"&gt;@OMatlock&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;could&lt;/EM&gt; do this but you would need to forward it to something that has a cert with a SAN of everything publically accessable to stop it from throwing a security certificate error. Not a hard thing to do.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-11-30T18:38:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Maintenance Page redirection via Palo Alto?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241724#M69218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey folks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have an HQ site and Colo site.&amp;nbsp; We are moving our Colo site to a new datacenter.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have two firewalls in HA.&amp;nbsp; I've already broken HA and taken the PA#2 over to new datacenter for early standup.&amp;nbsp; Leaving PA#1 at current site Active with user connections, until move day.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On move day, I have this request (requirement) from management that says, "we need a maintenance page during the move that we can set without having to change Public DNS records" (Network Solutions).&amp;nbsp; The question from management is "Can't we just re-route all incoming requests to our current Public IPs&amp;nbsp;into Colo firewall to a specific external (anywhere) IP address maintenance page"?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are trying to eliminate having to change our Public DNS records twice (saving propagation time).&amp;nbsp; Instead of having to change once for maintenance page and once for new IP, do this "re-route" at the firewall option temporary, and remove when making Public DNS records change once.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts about it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 17:40:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241724#M69218</guid>
      <dc:creator>OMatlock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T17:40:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintenance Page redirection via Palo Alto?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241739#M69221</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/56398"&gt;@OMatlock&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;could&lt;/EM&gt; do this but you would need to forward it to something that has a cert with a SAN of everything publically accessable to stop it from throwing a security certificate error. Not a hard thing to do.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:38:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241739#M69221</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T18:38:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintenance Page redirection via Palo Alto?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241742#M69224</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yea, you mean because the IP would change (via NAT I assume) tipping off the certificate for our services?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We do have several.&amp;nbsp; We do have a wild card in place, but not for everything.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the sounds of it, may not have enough time (with everything else) to get that setup.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From a networking level.&amp;nbsp; How would this be done?&amp;nbsp; I mean, Colo firewall could catch certain Public IP requests and "re-direct" them elsewhere?&amp;nbsp; Is that a NAT rule?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 19:03:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241742#M69224</guid>
      <dc:creator>OMatlock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T19:03:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintenance Page redirection via Palo Alto?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241747#M69227</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/56398"&gt;@OMatlock&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Right. If you have your stuff setup with a wildcard cert that's less of an issue, as the cert technically would cover your maintenance page. For anything that isn't setup like that though you would need a SAN on the cert of your maintenance page to actually include the new host or url in question.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would just reset the NAT rules to point towards your new maintenance page host. So instead of actually hitting your web-server for example it would hit the server hosting this static page.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 20:56:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241747#M69227</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T20:56:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintenance Page redirection via Palo Alto?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241847#M69243</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/56398"&gt;@OMatlock&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;They are trying to eliminate having to change our Public DNS records twice (saving propagation time).&amp;nbsp; Instead of having to change once for maintenance page and once for new IP, do this "re-route" at the firewall option temporary, and remove when making Public DNS records change once.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any thoughts about it?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about lowering the TTL on the existing record to a time that would make changes more efficient?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 13:29:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/241847#M69243</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-03T13:29:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintenance Page redirection via Palo Alto?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/242126#M69305</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/5300"&gt;@Brandon_Wertz&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yea, I am going to test a laptop hanging off our new location tomorrow with our wildcard and test some stuff out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We use Network Solutions.&amp;nbsp; Their default TTL is 2 hours.&amp;nbsp; We may lower it to their minimum of 1 hour.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for y'alls feedback!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2018 22:39:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/242126#M69305</guid>
      <dc:creator>OMatlock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-04T22:39:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Maintenance Page redirection via Palo Alto?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/243195#M69548</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!!&amp;nbsp; This worked out.&amp;nbsp; Changed all NAT rules to our maintenance page (on a laptop w/IIS).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We even installed our Wildcard it worked out for what we needed.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2018 17:01:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/maintenance-page-redirection-via-palo-alto/m-p/243195#M69548</guid>
      <dc:creator>OMatlock</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-13T17:01:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

