<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA500 HA with Layer 3 OSPF connectivity to Core in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa500-ha-with-layer-3-ospf-connectivity-to-core/m-p/241865#M69248</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would not make them the same. It is there to prevent split brain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/71/pan-os/pan-os/high-availability/device-priority-and-preemption" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/71/pan-os/pan-os/high-availability/device-priority-and-preemption&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have preemption disabled to prevent a flapping scenario. If there is a failover event, I want the standby unit to stay active until I can determine why it occured. In the older code and models, I had it enabled and it caused a flapping where they would see a failure and constantly flip back and forth and cause downtime for me. It was a weird scenario that I have only faced once however.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:47:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-12-03T16:47:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA500 HA with Layer 3 OSPF connectivity to Core</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa500-ha-with-layer-3-ospf-connectivity-to-core/m-p/241731#M69219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We currently have 2 PA 500 which are currently&amp;nbsp; configured for HA. But don't think its currently setup correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is what I can find regarding as to what we want to achieve.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Active passive with OSPF&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/servlet/fileField?entityId=ka10g000000CyRYAA0&amp;amp;field=Attachment_1__Body__s" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/servlet/fileField?entityId=ka10g000000CyRYAA0&amp;amp;field=Attachment_1__Body__s&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the above article doesn't really make sense, like on the widget display it says HA peer's IP used is 1.1.1.4&amp;nbsp; and 1.1.1.15.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:14:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa500-ha-with-layer-3-ospf-connectivity-to-core/m-p/241731#M69219</guid>
      <dc:creator>Huddlebuy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T18:14:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA500 HA with Layer 3 OSPF connectivity to Core</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa500-ha-with-layer-3-ospf-connectivity-to-core/m-p/241738#M69220</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/28460"&gt;@Huddlebuy&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What exactly is confusing you in the document you linked to?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As for the IPs, if these units are directly connected it doesn't matter what IP you are using; the documentation should have used RFC1918 addresses in its example, but a lot of older docs used 1.0.0.0/8 addresses as it was assigned for research for the longest time and didn't actually matter. In your environment, these IPs should be something local to your environment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:37:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa500-ha-with-layer-3-ospf-connectivity-to-core/m-p/241738#M69220</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-11-30T18:37:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA500 HA with Layer 3 OSPF connectivity to Core</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa500-ha-with-layer-3-ospf-connectivity-to-core/m-p/241840#M69241</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yeah that makes sense. Does the device priority need to be same on both devices?&amp;nbsp; disabling &lt;SPAN&gt;Preemption&lt;/SPAN&gt; ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 11:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa500-ha-with-layer-3-ospf-connectivity-to-core/m-p/241840#M69241</guid>
      <dc:creator>Huddlebuy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-03T11:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA500 HA with Layer 3 OSPF connectivity to Core</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa500-ha-with-layer-3-ospf-connectivity-to-core/m-p/241865#M69248</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would not make them the same. It is there to prevent split brain.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/71/pan-os/pan-os/high-availability/device-priority-and-preemption" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/71/pan-os/pan-os/high-availability/device-priority-and-preemption&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have preemption disabled to prevent a flapping scenario. If there is a failover event, I want the standby unit to stay active until I can determine why it occured. In the older code and models, I had it enabled and it caused a flapping where they would see a failure and constantly flip back and forth and cause downtime for me. It was a weird scenario that I have only faced once however.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2018 16:47:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa500-ha-with-layer-3-ospf-connectivity-to-core/m-p/241865#M69248</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-12-03T16:47:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

