<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Connecting PA820 to Cisco ASA HA in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/connecting-pa820-to-cisco-asa-ha/m-p/245436#M69943</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you have 2x ASA's and 1x PAN? Dont think an AE would work, I could be wrong. How about making the physical interfaces on the PAN layer 2 and making the vlan interface on the PAN layer3. This way the two PAN ports are just 'switch' ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 23:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-09T23:19:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Connecting PA820 to Cisco ASA HA</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/connecting-pa820-to-cisco-asa-ha/m-p/245415#M69941</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to connect PA820 to ASA HA setup. ASA1 and ASA2 need to connect to PA820. Can I use link aggregation on PA820 for this scenario? If one of the ASAs fails will this setup work to pass on the traffic using the other ASA.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 22:07:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/connecting-pa820-to-cisco-asa-ha/m-p/245415#M69941</guid>
      <dc:creator>sajidsil</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T22:07:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Connecting PA820 to Cisco ASA HA</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/connecting-pa820-to-cisco-asa-ha/m-p/245436#M69943</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So you have 2x ASA's and 1x PAN? Dont think an AE would work, I could be wrong. How about making the physical interfaces on the PAN layer 2 and making the vlan interface on the PAN layer3. This way the two PAN ports are just 'switch' ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 23:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/connecting-pa820-to-cisco-asa-ha/m-p/245436#M69943</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T23:19:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Connecting PA820 to Cisco ASA HA</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/connecting-pa820-to-cisco-asa-ha/m-p/245577#M69968</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/88841"&gt;@sajidsil&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Actually AE ports would work perfectly fine here as the non-active port would simply be shown as 'down' as the HA process in ASA shuts down the ports. However,&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27580"&gt;@OtakarKlier&lt;/a&gt;'s method is better then AE interfaces in this situation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 18:44:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/connecting-pa820-to-cisco-asa-ha/m-p/245577#M69968</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-10T18:44:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

