<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Port Scan/Host Sweep settings... in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-scan-host-sweep-settings/m-p/9559#M7009</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a great question, but it is a question with no one-size-fits-all answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It might first be helpful to characterize your network traffic. Once you have some network traffic data you can start using that to tune your settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your settings look perfectly reasonable &lt;STRONG&gt;if &lt;/STRONG&gt;your assumptions are reasonable. Without knowing more about your network it's guessing game to look at your proposed settings and try and render judgement about their appropriateness.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Possibly there are some other readers out there with some good rules-of-thumb to share?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Benjamin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:31:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>bpappas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-02-07T23:31:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Port Scan/Host Sweep settings...</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-scan-host-sweep-settings/m-p/9558#M7008</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is everyone using for their Port Scan/Host Sweep settings in the Zone Protection profile?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mine are at...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;TCP Port Scan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5 secs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;800 events&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;UDP Port Scan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5 secs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;800 events&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Host Sweep&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2 secs&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;200 events&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;...I may have to fine tune it some more to lower the amount of "false readings".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 20:30:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-scan-host-sweep-settings/m-p/9558#M7008</guid>
      <dc:creator>jambulo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-03T20:30:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Port Scan/Host Sweep settings...</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-scan-host-sweep-settings/m-p/9559#M7009</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a great question, but it is a question with no one-size-fits-all answer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It might first be helpful to characterize your network traffic. Once you have some network traffic data you can start using that to tune your settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your settings look perfectly reasonable &lt;STRONG&gt;if &lt;/STRONG&gt;your assumptions are reasonable. Without knowing more about your network it's guessing game to look at your proposed settings and try and render judgement about their appropriateness.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Possibly there are some other readers out there with some good rules-of-thumb to share?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Benjamin&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Feb 2011 23:31:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-scan-host-sweep-settings/m-p/9559#M7009</guid>
      <dc:creator>bpappas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-02-07T23:31:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

