<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Port Translation very slow in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-translation-very-slow/m-p/250627#M71272</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;from a NAT perspective, this should not matter&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;have you been able to run packetcapturesin front and behind the firewall to see where delays are introduced?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-20T14:10:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Port Translation very slow</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-translation-very-slow/m-p/250550#M71257</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;We setup a inbound NAT to direct port 443 to a server on-site on 10.x.x.x and it all worked fine and fast - then it turned out we needed to adjust it to port 4443 as the customer was using port 443 for inbound client VPN connections of course.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Anyway, after I adjusted the NAT inbound for this one rule (a simple change of 443 to 4443) - the whole access method slowed down using port 4443 to the point where it is unusable / not responding.&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;We thought this might be because port 4443, so I tested with 2100 - same result - but the same rule with 443 redirected is fine and fast -&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;Can&amp;nbsp;someone please&amp;nbsp;advise why this is going so slow when not using the port 443 as the standard inbound NAT to this web server?&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 02:23:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-translation-very-slow/m-p/250550#M71257</guid>
      <dc:creator>FarzanaMustafa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-20T02:23:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Port Translation very slow</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-translation-very-slow/m-p/250627#M71272</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;from a NAT perspective, this should not matter&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;have you been able to run packetcapturesin front and behind the firewall to see where delays are introduced?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 14:10:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/port-translation-very-slow/m-p/250627#M71272</guid>
      <dc:creator>reaper</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-20T14:10:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

