<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Sub-Interface for one IP address in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sub-interface-for-one-ip-address/m-p/251393#M71491</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a generic question about the Palo alto way of treating sub interfaces? Can I do sub interface on one of the physical interface for one netwrok address? for example, I did sub interface the ethernet1/5 as ethernet 1/5.123 and configured the netwrok 10.11.12.13/24 and no other networks exist on overall that physical interface. Connection to downstream switch is trunk by the way with allowing native vlan and vlan 123?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe we can do this, as I couldn't recall exactly what I did preaviuosly, but I did ran into issues with Cisco ASA firewall,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when I ran a trunk from switch to ASA and allowing only native and one custom vlan, ASA didn't accept the packets coming from the custom vlan when I did subinterface for that one vlan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>nagarjuna.b</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-02-26T17:29:48Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Sub-Interface for one IP address</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sub-interface-for-one-ip-address/m-p/251393#M71491</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi There,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a generic question about the Palo alto way of treating sub interfaces? Can I do sub interface on one of the physical interface for one netwrok address? for example, I did sub interface the ethernet1/5 as ethernet 1/5.123 and configured the netwrok 10.11.12.13/24 and no other networks exist on overall that physical interface. Connection to downstream switch is trunk by the way with allowing native vlan and vlan 123?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I believe we can do this, as I couldn't recall exactly what I did preaviuosly, but I did ran into issues with Cisco ASA firewall,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;when I ran a trunk from switch to ASA and allowing only native and one custom vlan, ASA didn't accept the packets coming from the custom vlan when I did subinterface for that one vlan.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 17:29:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sub-interface-for-one-ip-address/m-p/251393#M71491</guid>
      <dc:creator>nagarjuna.b</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T17:29:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sub-Interface for one IP address</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sub-interface-for-one-ip-address/m-p/251431#M71495</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You dont need to use native vlans for the PAN. What I do is setup sub-interfaces as L2 and then make the vlan interface L3. Just seems more flexible to me but its just my opinion.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sub-interface-for-one-ip-address/m-p/251431#M71495</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T19:08:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Sub-Interface for one IP address</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sub-interface-for-one-ip-address/m-p/251442#M71499</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes you can set it up as you describe. Physical interface can be blank.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2019 19:37:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/sub-interface-for-one-ip-address/m-p/251442#M71499</guid>
      <dc:creator>Raido_Rattameister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-02-26T19:37:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

