<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Application ID accurate on encrypted traffic? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-id-accurate-on-encrypted-traffic/m-p/252552#M71773</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/210"&gt;@craig.brooker&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When traffic isn't being decrypted the firewall does a "best effort" attempt to correctly identify the traffic with the information that it&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;can&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;see. Usually for an application like youtube or facebook, this will direct all traffic to the base app-id; so in effect youtube traffic when identified will only be identified as youtube-base, and facebook traffic likewise will only be identified as facebook-base.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 18:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-06T18:14:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Application ID accurate on encrypted traffic?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-id-accurate-on-encrypted-traffic/m-p/252521#M71770</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Does the PA do application identification for SSL encrypted traffic without if we aren't doing SSL decryption?&amp;nbsp; For example if a user watches an encrypted youtube video, is the PA able to identify that traffic as youtube, or will it be reported as ssl?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 16:02:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-id-accurate-on-encrypted-traffic/m-p/252521#M71770</guid>
      <dc:creator>craig.brooker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T16:02:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Application ID accurate on encrypted traffic?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-id-accurate-on-encrypted-traffic/m-p/252552#M71773</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/210"&gt;@craig.brooker&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When traffic isn't being decrypted the firewall does a "best effort" attempt to correctly identify the traffic with the information that it&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;can&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;see. Usually for an application like youtube or facebook, this will direct all traffic to the base app-id; so in effect youtube traffic when identified will only be identified as youtube-base, and facebook traffic likewise will only be identified as facebook-base.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2019 18:14:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/application-id-accurate-on-encrypted-traffic/m-p/252552#M71773</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-06T18:14:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

