<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Suspended HA partner becomes active in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/256019#M72623</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you mean that after sometime suspended PA which become active changed the state to passive once network was restored&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;automatically?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 01:41:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MP18</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-04T01:41:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Suspended HA partner becomes active</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/118695#M45661</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We are in the process of setting up HA between two PA-5050 running PANOS 6.1.14. After configuring everything and testing failover in our main data center we performed "Suspend local device" on the passive node and shut it down to move it to our secondary site. After it was moved there and powered on we started to connect the various interfaces. This caused a major outage in our network, and when I connected to the console port on the (presumed) suspended firewall I saw that it had gone active. Is this a bug in PAN-OS, or did we miss a step somewhere?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:11:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/118695#M45661</guid>
      <dc:creator>LCMember1959</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-10T10:11:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suspended HA partner becomes active</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/118704#M45662</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Suspend option will be "reset" &amp;nbsp;after reboot. How about your preemption option on the "passive" node after you fire it up?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Learning-Articles/Understanding-Preemption-with-the-Configured-Device-Priority-in/ta-p/53398" target="_blank"&gt;https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Learning-Articles/Understanding-Preemption-with-the-Configured-Device-Priority-in/ta-p/53398&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Myky&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/118704#M45662</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-10T10:46:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suspended HA partner becomes active</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/118706#M45663</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Device priority on the firewall in our main data center is set to 100 and the other is set to 111. Preemption is enabled. I am guessing when the passive partner booted up without network connectivity and no longer suspended it assumed that the active partner was down and made itself active. Then the interfaces were connected and we got a split brain scenario.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:52:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/118706#M45663</guid>
      <dc:creator>LCMember1959</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-10T10:52:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suspended HA partner becomes active</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/118707#M45664</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Agreed. So firewall should recover from the&amp;nbsp;(split brain scenario) after connectivity has been established. We had a similar situation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2016 10:59:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/118707#M45664</guid>
      <dc:creator>TranceforLife</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-10T10:59:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Suspended HA partner becomes active</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/256019#M72623</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you mean that after sometime suspended PA which become active changed the state to passive once network was restored&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;automatically?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 01:41:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/suspended-ha-partner-becomes-active/m-p/256019#M72623</guid>
      <dc:creator>MP18</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-04T01:41:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

