<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Query on Split tunneling in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/query-on-split-tunneling/m-p/256936#M72892</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;perhaps run "route print" on local device to ensure route command has taken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also... if your /32 host is non routable then it will then try the default (tunnel) route as it just has a higher metric value.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mick_Ball</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-10T08:01:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Query on Split tunneling</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/query-on-split-tunneling/m-p/256908#M72880</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We are trying&amp;nbsp; to exclude one IP from including routing in split tunneling.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;VPN is working, however, I found that when going to 192.168.16.22, still through VPN rather than local LAN.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What we need to setup is ONLY this range, 192.168.0.0/16, will be accessed via VPN except one particular IP shown below.&lt;BR /&gt;Looks like we need to use include and exclude both to achieve this or do we have any other method?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Config.png" style="width: 800px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/19544i7ABD778E5894B019/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Config.png" alt="Config.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 05:02:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/query-on-split-tunneling/m-p/256908#M72880</guid>
      <dc:creator>FarzanaMustafa</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-10T05:02:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Query on Split tunneling</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/query-on-split-tunneling/m-p/256936#M72892</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;perhaps run "route print" on local device to ensure route command has taken.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;also... if your /32 host is non routable then it will then try the default (tunnel) route as it just has a higher metric value.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 08:01:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/query-on-split-tunneling/m-p/256936#M72892</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mick_Ball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-10T08:01:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

