<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PA-220 Throughput Explanation in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257285#M72990</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;if that were true wouldnt that be 300 Mbps of throughput?&amp;nbsp; The data sheet dows not say 150 both ways.&amp;nbsp; Can you please explain how your interpreting that?&amp;nbsp; Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/42838"&gt;@fjwcash&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/92764"&gt;@MarioMarquez&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the details.&amp;nbsp; I'm up in the air about getting a 100 down 100 up internet circuit for a site with a PA-220.&amp;nbsp; if 150 Mbps is the least i will achive that means the same thing as saying 75 down 75 up is the least the PA-220 will be able to handle.&amp;nbsp; Is that correct?&amp;nbsp; Do you think a 100 down 100 up circuit is too much for this PA-220?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, that is not correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 150 Mbps is per direction.&amp;nbsp; Meaning it can handle 150 Mbps of downloads along with 150 Mbps of uploads simultaneously.&amp;nbsp; So a 100/100 connection will be fine for a PA-220.&amp;nbsp; Even a lowly PA-200 could handle a 100/100 connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:26:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarioMarquez</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-11T16:26:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PA-220 Throughput Explanation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257116#M72940</link>
      <description>Can someone please tell me the maximum Upload/Download speed in megabits per second for a PA-220 with app-id and all threat prevention/ips features enabled along with an ipsec tunnel? The data sheet is a little confusing and I understand that it bases the specs from 64k packets but I don't know if this had 150 up 150 down or 50 up 50 down. Can someone tell me the the throughput I should expect in my use case mentioned above and explain yourself?</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 02:05:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257116#M72940</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarioMarquez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-11T02:05:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Throughput Explanation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257173#M72952</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/92764"&gt;@MarioMarquez&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it means, that the firewall can process 150 Mbps in total, with all of the ips/app-id features enabled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you got this setup, A -&amp;gt; Palo -&amp;gt; B and you configured the policy set with App-ID/Content-ID and you fire as many 64KB sessions through that setup, you will achieve at lease 150 Mbps of throughput,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In real life, you will have a higher troughput, because youre policy set is more differentiated and the less "any" statements you have there, the better the firewall will perform. E.G. opening a normal website results in lots of sessions to donwload pictures, css files and so on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can calculate with that values but can expect better performance in real life.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chacko&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:14:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257173#M72952</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chacko42</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-11T08:14:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Throughput Explanation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257200#M72960</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;thanks for the details.&amp;nbsp; I'm up in the air about getting a 100 down 100 up internet circuit for a site with a PA-220.&amp;nbsp; if 150 Mbps is the least i will achive that means the same thing as saying 75 down 75 up is the least the PA-220 will be able to handle.&amp;nbsp; Is that correct?&amp;nbsp; Do you think a 100 down 100 up circuit is too much for this PA-220?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 12:37:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257200#M72960</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarioMarquez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-11T12:37:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Throughput Explanation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257244#M72972</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/92764"&gt;@MarioMarquez&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;yes that's right.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Typically the existing capacities are never used to 100%.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even a whole building with a few hundred people may be connected with 10G fibres, but the real consumption will be around I guess 20-50 mbit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So having a PA-220 for a small site with 200mbit is fine, we have PA-220s installed with complete network segmentation between servers and clients and so on (with smaller sites of course) - never had a problem with throughput.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Chacko&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:26:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257244#M72972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Chacko42</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-11T14:26:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Throughput Explanation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257274#M72988</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/92764"&gt;@MarioMarquez&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the details.&amp;nbsp; I'm up in the air about getting a 100 down 100 up internet circuit for a site with a PA-220.&amp;nbsp; if 150 Mbps is the least i will achive that means the same thing as saying 75 down 75 up is the least the PA-220 will be able to handle.&amp;nbsp; Is that correct?&amp;nbsp; Do you think a 100 down 100 up circuit is too much for this PA-220?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, that is not correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 150 Mbps is per direction.&amp;nbsp; Meaning it can handle 150 Mbps of downloads along with 150 Mbps of uploads simultaneously.&amp;nbsp; So a 100/100 connection will be fine for a PA-220.&amp;nbsp; Even a lowly PA-200 could handle a 100/100 connection.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 15:58:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257274#M72988</guid>
      <dc:creator>fjwcash</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-11T15:58:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Throughput Explanation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257285#M72990</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;if that were true wouldnt that be 300 Mbps of throughput?&amp;nbsp; The data sheet dows not say 150 both ways.&amp;nbsp; Can you please explain how your interpreting that?&amp;nbsp; Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/42838"&gt;@fjwcash&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/92764"&gt;@MarioMarquez&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;thanks for the details.&amp;nbsp; I'm up in the air about getting a 100 down 100 up internet circuit for a site with a PA-220.&amp;nbsp; if 150 Mbps is the least i will achive that means the same thing as saying 75 down 75 up is the least the PA-220 will be able to handle.&amp;nbsp; Is that correct?&amp;nbsp; Do you think a 100 down 100 up circuit is too much for this PA-220?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;No, that is not correct.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The 150 Mbps is per direction.&amp;nbsp; Meaning it can handle 150 Mbps of downloads along with 150 Mbps of uploads simultaneously.&amp;nbsp; So a 100/100 connection will be fine for a PA-220.&amp;nbsp; Even a lowly PA-200 could handle a 100/100 connection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 16:26:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257285#M72990</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarioMarquez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-11T16:26:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Throughput Explanation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257300#M72994</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You apply the restrictions (App-ID, Threat Prevention, etc) on a Security Policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Security Policies apply to traffic going in one direction (a single session).&amp;nbsp; For example, web traffic from clients.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You can apply it to policies covering sessions in each direction.&amp;nbsp; For example, connections from external clients to local servers.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You don't have to set it on every policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It only limits traffic that matches the policy.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, on our PA-500s, we have all the restrictions enabled for our wired desktops, which limits that traffic to 250 Mbps.&amp;nbsp; But we don't enable it on our Chromebooks subnet.&amp;nbsp; And our traffic graphs routinely go over 400 Mbps for downloads.&amp;nbsp; With 100+ Mbps for uploads.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The restriction is per policy and only affects traffic that matches the policy.&amp;nbsp; It's not a max for the device if you enable it on a single policy.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:30:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/257300#M72994</guid>
      <dc:creator>fjwcash</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-11T17:30:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PA-220 Throughput Explanation</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/316508#M81394</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;Chacko,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Would you please confirm how many users do you have behind PA-220? I'd like to buy this product for 1 office with less than 100 peoples but all recommendations says I need to buy PA-850, mainly because of the&amp;nbsp;Connections per second. Everybody says modern browsers triggers like 710 connections with 5/10 tabs opened so PA-220 wouldn't be able to handle 100 users.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any&amp;nbsp;advice will be highly appreciated...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ariel&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2020 14:49:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/pa-220-throughput-explanation/m-p/316508#M81394</guid>
      <dc:creator>akbronka</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-03-15T14:49:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

