<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Does using OSPF for redundnacy to 2 different standalone FW's work in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/does-using-ospf-for-redundnacy-to-2-different-standalone-fw-s/m-p/257478#M73033</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure why they wiould say it doesnt work. I am running OSPF and have several different PAN models. OSPF is a standard and as long as a device supprots it it will run just fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What will not work is two different models in an HA configuration. Perhaps that is what they were referring to?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 17:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-12T17:46:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does using OSPF for redundnacy to 2 different standalone FW's work</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/does-using-ospf-for-redundnacy-to-2-different-standalone-fw-s/m-p/257446#M73027</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is anyone using OSPF to provide hardware/route failover with 2 different PA models?&amp;nbsp; (3020 and a 3220).&amp;nbsp; cannot afford HA 3220 now but would like to have failover to old box.&amp;nbsp; Palo is saying this is not a support design?&amp;nbsp; I thought OSPF is network 101 basic design?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 15:44:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/does-using-ospf-for-redundnacy-to-2-different-standalone-fw-s/m-p/257446#M73027</guid>
      <dc:creator>partners-syn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-12T15:44:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does using OSPF for redundnacy to 2 different standalone FW's work</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/does-using-ospf-for-redundnacy-to-2-different-standalone-fw-s/m-p/257478#M73033</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not sure why they wiould say it doesnt work. I am running OSPF and have several different PAN models. OSPF is a standard and as long as a device supprots it it will run just fine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What will not work is two different models in an HA configuration. Perhaps that is what they were referring to?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that helps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 17:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/does-using-ospf-for-redundnacy-to-2-different-standalone-fw-s/m-p/257478#M73033</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-12T17:46:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does using OSPF for redundnacy to 2 different standalone FW's work</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/does-using-ospf-for-redundnacy-to-2-different-standalone-fw-s/m-p/257504#M73040</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Agreed.&amp;nbsp; As long as you don't have asynchronous routing or are load balancing with another product to keep your flows on the same firewall (ie - F5),&amp;nbsp; you should be fine.&amp;nbsp; Based on your description, I'm guessing you don't have full control over your packet flows and would need an Active/Active setup.&amp;nbsp; This is not supported on non-identical models.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps you can describe your environment a little more?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:57:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/does-using-ospf-for-redundnacy-to-2-different-standalone-fw-s/m-p/257504#M73040</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeremy.larsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-12T20:57:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

