<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: New NG PA implementation path URL in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257917#M73176</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;that's a great idea, but then we'd need to register a new domain. Then we'd need to buy a new domain in Entrust for the certificate to match the new zone. All doable but sort of not thought of before.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our 10 year old ASA could do it no dramas.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you though. I really do appriciate your replies and help&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 22:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>au_igs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-04-17T22:28:32Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>New NG PA implementation path URL</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257792#M73133</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all, we are replacing our aging ASA VPN with the new PA GlobalProtect. ASA has a path of someurl.com/path rather than just a default someurl.com. Makes it a bit harder for the bad guys to guess. Is PA capable of creating a path, rather than a default url?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you in advance for the help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 01:35:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257792#M73133</guid>
      <dc:creator>au_igs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-17T01:35:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New NG PA implementation path URL</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257811#M73137</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not really no.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Generally speaking it would be best practice to use a totally unrelated domain for the company/organization the remote access is for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, it wouldnt be advisable for CompanyA to use...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eg "remoteaccess.companya.com"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Something generic that could not be traced back to the CompanyA in question would be much more advisable. Also the use of a top level domain that doesnt require it to be registered to a legitimate organisation if you want to be really paranoid....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;eg. "tasty.spacechicken.systems"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Obviously something more appropriate than that, but you get the idea &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":slightly_smiling_face:"&gt;🙂&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 05:28:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257811#M73137</guid>
      <dc:creator>El-ahrairah</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-17T05:28:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New NG PA implementation path URL</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257865#M73153</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/58143"&gt;@El-ahrairah&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That is one cool domain ;)!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 14:54:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257865#M73153</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-17T14:54:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New NG PA implementation path URL</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257905#M73170</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/111187"&gt;@au_igs&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all, we are replacing our aging ASA VPN with the new PA GlobalProtect. ASA has a path of someurl.com/path rather than just a default someurl.com. Makes it a bit harder for the bad guys to guess. Is PA capable of creating a path, rather than a default url?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you in advance for the help&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think this is easier than you think, or perhaps I'm not understanding.&amp;nbsp; I just went through swapping out ~6,000 laptops from AnyConnect to GP.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For GP you define the DNS name so there's not really a common path that an external entity could guess would be your company's GP portal.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:24:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257905#M73170</guid>
      <dc:creator>Brandon_Wertz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-17T18:24:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New NG PA implementation path URL</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257917#M73176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;that's a great idea, but then we'd need to register a new domain. Then we'd need to buy a new domain in Entrust for the certificate to match the new zone. All doable but sort of not thought of before.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Our 10 year old ASA could do it no dramas.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you though. I really do appriciate your replies and help&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Apr 2019 22:28:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/257917#M73176</guid>
      <dc:creator>au_igs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-17T22:28:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: New NG PA implementation path URL</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/258010#M73202</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/58143"&gt;@El-ahrairah&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also the use of a top level domain that doesnt require it to be registered to a legitimate organisation if you want to be really paranoid....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;... and don't use anything "better" than a domain validation certificate - self signed would be good too if all the devices that connect are under your control &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:51:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/new-ng-pa-implementation-path-url/m-p/258010#M73202</guid>
      <dc:creator>Remo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-04-18T14:51:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

