<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Dual IPsec Tunnel to same destination with ECMP in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-ipsec-tunnel-to-same-destination-with-ecmp/m-p/268747#M74567</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you using any dynamic routing protocol?&amp;nbsp; OSPF?&amp;nbsp; BGP?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>jeremy.larsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-11T14:45:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Dual IPsec Tunnel to same destination with ECMP</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-ipsec-tunnel-to-same-destination-with-ecmp/m-p/268635#M74560</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;BR /&gt;I would like to set up two ipsec tunnels to the same destination. I know I could do this by assigning the tunnel interfaces different metrics in the VR. But if I do that, only one tunnel will forward traffic at a given time. In our setup traffic needs to actively flow over any tunnel that is up:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-left" image-alt="topology.PNG" style="width: 781px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/20357i6C304E3BEAA91EDF/image-size/large/is-moderation-mode/true?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="topology.PNG" alt="topology.PNG" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can this be achieved with ECMP? I thought about creating a second VR with both tunnel interfaces being members in it and just enabling ECMP on the VR.We only have 1 WAN interface, does this have to be member of that VR or can it reamin in default VR.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Many thanks in advance for you help&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 09:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-ipsec-tunnel-to-same-destination-with-ecmp/m-p/268635#M74560</guid>
      <dc:creator>lostdragon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-11T09:24:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual IPsec Tunnel to same destination with ECMP</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-ipsec-tunnel-to-same-destination-with-ecmp/m-p/268747#M74567</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are you using any dynamic routing protocol?&amp;nbsp; OSPF?&amp;nbsp; BGP?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-ipsec-tunnel-to-same-destination-with-ecmp/m-p/268747#M74567</guid>
      <dc:creator>jeremy.larsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-11T14:45:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Dual IPsec Tunnel to same destination with ECMP</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-ipsec-tunnel-to-same-destination-with-ecmp/m-p/268748#M74568</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Jeremy, no, at the moment just static routes.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 14:48:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dual-ipsec-tunnel-to-same-destination-with-ecmp/m-p/268748#M74568</guid>
      <dc:creator>lostdragon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-11T14:48:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

