<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic BGP peering on loopbacks, struggle is real in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-peering-on-loopbacks-struggle-is-real/m-p/269446#M74618</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am really struggling with this. I have been at it for hours. I have two Palo Altos in standalone mode both forwarding traffic.I have connected to each palo cisco 9500s and Cisco 9300s. These are not fully meshed. So i know that I am going to need RR.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot for the life of me get peering to work on the loopback interfaces of the palos. The session never forms on the Cisco switches. Do I need to create a policy for this traffic to pass?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running OSPF between all devices and redistributing connected routes only allowing the the loopbbacks. So on all the switches I see these all the looback addresses. The Palos also see them so I know OSPF is working. Then when i try to peer bgp with loopbacks it never forms. I am using update-source loopback on the Cisco side but i am not sure that exists on the Palo side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see the loopback in the local rib on the palo but not rib out. so i assume thats why its not working?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stevenjwilliams83</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-13T02:24:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>BGP peering on loopbacks, struggle is real</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-peering-on-loopbacks-struggle-is-real/m-p/269446#M74618</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am really struggling with this. I have been at it for hours. I have two Palo Altos in standalone mode both forwarding traffic.I have connected to each palo cisco 9500s and Cisco 9300s. These are not fully meshed. So i know that I am going to need RR.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I cannot for the life of me get peering to work on the loopback interfaces of the palos. The session never forms on the Cisco switches. Do I need to create a policy for this traffic to pass?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running OSPF between all devices and redistributing connected routes only allowing the the loopbbacks. So on all the switches I see these all the looback addresses. The Palos also see them so I know OSPF is working. Then when i try to peer bgp with loopbacks it never forms. I am using update-source loopback on the Cisco side but i am not sure that exists on the Palo side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I see the loopback in the local rib on the palo but not rib out. so i assume thats why its not working?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 02:24:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-peering-on-loopbacks-struggle-is-real/m-p/269446#M74618</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stevenjwilliams83</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-13T02:24:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP peering on loopbacks, struggle is real</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-peering-on-loopbacks-struggle-is-real/m-p/269661#M74642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are the Loopback interfaces in the same zone? If not you will need policies. I say create a new policy as number 1 to allow the traffic and select logging at start and end. The other option would be to do a pcap to see if the packets are getting to the PAN and where they are getting dropped.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:38:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-peering-on-loopbacks-struggle-is-real/m-p/269661#M74642</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-13T15:38:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: BGP peering on loopbacks, struggle is real</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-peering-on-loopbacks-struggle-is-real/m-p/271013#M74787</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So this was it. Zone to Zone allowing of app BGP was needed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:51:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/bgp-peering-on-loopbacks-struggle-is-real/m-p/271013#M74787</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stevenjwilliams83</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-18T17:51:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

