<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Virtual Wires and Tag allowed in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wires-and-tag-allowed/m-p/273626#M75058</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any specific reason why we can't have&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;same VLAN tag&amp;nbsp; defined on the parent virtual wire interface and the subinterface ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks ..&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deepak12</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-06-27T18:19:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Virtual Wires and Tag allowed</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wires-and-tag-allowed/m-p/273626#M75058</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there any specific reason why we can't have&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;same VLAN tag&amp;nbsp; defined on the parent virtual wire interface and the subinterface ?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks ..&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 18:19:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wires-and-tag-allowed/m-p/273626#M75058</guid>
      <dc:creator>deepak12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T18:19:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual Wires and Tag allowed</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wires-and-tag-allowed/m-p/273646#M75062</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I guess my question would be, why would you want to? With subinterfaces, you are logically splitting up the interface into the different vlans. So what you are wanting is to setup two of the same thing.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope that makes sense.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 19:05:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wires-and-tag-allowed/m-p/273646#M75062</guid>
      <dc:creator>OtakarKlier</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T19:05:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Virtual Wires and Tag allowed</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wires-and-tag-allowed/m-p/273690#M75070</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/104297"&gt;@deepak12&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To more directly answer your question it's because you already of the VLAN assigned on the same interface, and therefore you can't be expecting a tag on both the actual interface and then the sub-interface at the exact same time.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 21:25:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/virtual-wires-and-tag-allowed/m-p/273690#M75070</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-06-27T21:25:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

