<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Allow web-browsing but not for users? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-web-browsing-but-not-for-users/m-p/281364#M75964</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/97832"&gt;@IpswichSchool&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A custom URL category would be the way to go here, as&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40484"&gt;@JulioMancia&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; mentioned. Just as a note however, if you utilize a custom URL category you do&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; need to be licensed to do so. That specific functionality can be utilized regardless of URL Filtering license status.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-06T17:08:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Allow web-browsing but not for users?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-web-browsing-but-not-for-users/m-p/281268#M75940</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;First post so please be gentle. I need to have a security rule to allow the Bitdefender application on my servers. Part of the Bitdefender application requires explicit web-browsing. That is obviously easy enough to do. My problem is that I don't want users to then be able to browse the web from those servers but because I have enabled web-browsing as part of the Bitdefender rule, they can.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there a way to stop this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 10:30:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-web-browsing-but-not-for-users/m-p/281268#M75940</guid>
      <dc:creator>IpswichSchool</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-06T10:30:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow web-browsing but not for users?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-web-browsing-but-not-for-users/m-p/281338#M75953</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Do you have the URL license on your firewall? if you do you can create a custom URL category to only allow the required domains for updating with the AppID's.&amp;nbsp; If you don't have the URL license, you still need the domains that need to be allowed.&amp;nbsp; You could create a rule using fqdn address objects and AppID's, the only problem with this solution is that IP's are contantly changing.&amp;nbsp; I think the default timer for fqdn refresh are 30min.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 13:40:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-web-browsing-but-not-for-users/m-p/281338#M75953</guid>
      <dc:creator>JulioMancia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-06T13:40:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow web-browsing but not for users?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-web-browsing-but-not-for-users/m-p/281364#M75964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/97832"&gt;@IpswichSchool&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A custom URL category would be the way to go here, as&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/40484"&gt;@JulioMancia&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; mentioned. Just as a note however, if you utilize a custom URL category you do&amp;nbsp;&lt;STRONG&gt;not&lt;/STRONG&gt; need to be licensed to do so. That specific functionality can be utilized regardless of URL Filtering license status.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Aug 2019 17:08:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-web-browsing-but-not-for-users/m-p/281364#M75964</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-06T17:08:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Allow web-browsing but not for users?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-web-browsing-but-not-for-users/m-p/439880#M99851</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/167045"&gt;@Kevin-OHare&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you move your question into a new topic. The original question in this thread mentions bitdefender, but outside of that it has nothing to do with what you are asking.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Oct 2021 02:45:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/allow-web-browsing-but-not-for-users/m-p/439880#M99851</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-10-10T02:45:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

