<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: App-ID - ms-rdp not allowed, traffic being blocked as cotp in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-id-ms-rdp-not-allowed-traffic-being-blocked-as-cotp/m-p/284837#M76353</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/110025"&gt;@Jonathan_Panes&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So first off you should really consider upgrading your firewall; your current build is old and has a number of security vulnerabilities that you'd want patched. Second, your initial thought on Implicit is correct, you don't need to include cotp or t.120 to get this to work correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As to why it's not getting identified correctly, my immediately jump to the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) What's your content version? I recall ms-rdp being updated recently, so it may be that your signature has gotten too old and the firewall can&amp;nbsp; no longer identify the traffic properly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Are you utilizing default ports? If you utilize non-standard ports cotp is going to fall under application-default due to it utilizing dynamic ports, md-rdp is only going to get identified properly when operating on 3389.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-08-23T17:43:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>App-ID - ms-rdp not allowed, traffic being blocked as cotp</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-id-ms-rdp-not-allowed-traffic-being-blocked-as-cotp/m-p/284766#M76347</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Were running 7.1.14.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ive created a rule to allowed ms-rdp to the rule. Ive checked first if ms-rdp has any dependencies, there is none. It implicitly uses cotp and t.120.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So from what i understand from the meaning of Implicitly uses, i only need to allow the main application which is ms-rdp and in turn it will allow implicitly cotp and t1.20. When we did our RDP testing the traffic got blocked with a policy-deny with an application of cotp. Ive added cotp to the rule and the connection worked on upon logging at session end its seeing it as ms-rdp.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So im not sure whether my understanding of the "Implicitly uses" is wrong or is there something else im missing out here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 14:11:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-id-ms-rdp-not-allowed-traffic-being-blocked-as-cotp/m-p/284766#M76347</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jonathan_Panes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-23T14:11:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: App-ID - ms-rdp not allowed, traffic being blocked as cotp</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-id-ms-rdp-not-allowed-traffic-being-blocked-as-cotp/m-p/284837#M76353</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/110025"&gt;@Jonathan_Panes&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So first off you should really consider upgrading your firewall; your current build is old and has a number of security vulnerabilities that you'd want patched. Second, your initial thought on Implicit is correct, you don't need to include cotp or t.120 to get this to work correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As to why it's not getting identified correctly, my immediately jump to the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) What's your content version? I recall ms-rdp being updated recently, so it may be that your signature has gotten too old and the firewall can&amp;nbsp; no longer identify the traffic properly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Are you utilizing default ports? If you utilize non-standard ports cotp is going to fall under application-default due to it utilizing dynamic ports, md-rdp is only going to get identified properly when operating on 3389.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 17:43:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/app-id-ms-rdp-not-allowed-traffic-being-blocked-as-cotp/m-p/284837#M76353</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-08-23T17:43:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

