<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286274#M76562</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Each group different split tunnel&amp;nbsp; .I think is one way to go to version 9 .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:49:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GeorgiosFakis</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-03T09:49:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286152#M76545</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the workaround when you want to assign same IP pool but different access routes to groups or users on the same gateway ?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So let's say that on the gateway I have 2 or more groups like Group1 and Group2 but I have one IP pool to assign IPs when they are connected but in Group2 I want split tunnel and define specific access routes where Group1 I need to have full tunnel ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I get this :&amp;nbsp;dynamic ip pool overlapping&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 07:24:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286152#M76545</guid>
      <dc:creator>GeorgiosFakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-02T07:24:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286159#M76546</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/106380"&gt;@GeorgiosFakis&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I haven't tested with 8.0, but in 8.1 and later you can use the "Client IP pool" tap at agent level, which&amp;nbsp; applies to all groups.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286159#M76546</guid>
      <dc:creator>BatD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-02T08:18:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286162#M76548</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes, that's true , in PAN-OS 8.1 you can do that but in 8.0 you cannot .Looking for a solution on 8.0 before I go to 8.1 next year.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2019 08:32:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286162#M76548</guid>
      <dc:creator>GeorgiosFakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-02T08:32:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286245#M76557</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hows about splitting the scope into 2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or increase mask to /23&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;default users 192.168.0.10-192.168.0.250&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;splitvtunnel. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;192.168.1.10-192.168.1.250&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 06:03:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286245#M76557</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mick_Ball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-03T06:03:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286262#M76558</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I agree , but I have 32 groups that need split tunneling and I have 9 gateways so it means 9x32=288 subnets&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 07:17:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286262#M76558</guid>
      <dc:creator>GeorgiosFakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-03T07:17:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286273#M76561</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK gotya... but..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm not quite sure of what your end result needs to be...&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;does each of your 32 groups require a different split tunnel config.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or would one split tunnel suit all (or most).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:46:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286273#M76561</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mick_Ball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-03T09:46:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286274#M76562</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Each group different split tunnel&amp;nbsp; .I think is one way to go to version 9 .&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 09:49:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286274#M76562</guid>
      <dc:creator>GeorgiosFakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-03T09:49:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286295#M76566</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;perhaps you are correct but it's killing me why you would need 32 different split tunnel configs ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 11:23:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286295#M76566</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mick_Ball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-03T11:23:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Global Protect PAN-OS 8.0 IP pools</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286522#M76608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Because I have 32 set of AD groups that they have different split tunnel networks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 11:35:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/global-protect-pan-os-8-0-ip-pools/m-p/286522#M76608</guid>
      <dc:creator>GeorgiosFakis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-04T11:35:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

