<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Caveats for changing interface netmask? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/caveats-for-changing-interface-netmask/m-p/287253#M76697</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/106575"&gt;@John-Palmer&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This depends largely on how the firewall is actually configured and how the rest of the network is actually setup. For example, it matters quite a bit if the firewall interface in question is Layer2 or Layer3, and if the firewall is participating in the DHCP/DHCP-Relay configuration for the clients at all.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 03:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-09T03:24:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Caveats for changing interface netmask?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/caveats-for-changing-interface-netmask/m-p/287093#M76675</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've got a client that wants to expand the network range on one of their interfaces for additional DHCP scope space, moving from a /24 to a /23.&amp;nbsp; I wanted to check if there are any caveats to this on the PAN side?&amp;nbsp; Will the update take effect as soon as the change is commited?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I'm currently scoping out the rest of the network to confirm if anything else needs to be updated as well for this to route/flow properly, but I wanted to confirm on this side, and I wasn't seeing much in the documentation on this.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2019 17:07:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/caveats-for-changing-interface-netmask/m-p/287093#M76675</guid>
      <dc:creator>John-Palmer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-06T17:07:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Caveats for changing interface netmask?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/caveats-for-changing-interface-netmask/m-p/287253#M76697</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/106575"&gt;@John-Palmer&lt;/a&gt;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This depends largely on how the firewall is actually configured and how the rest of the network is actually setup. For example, it matters quite a bit if the firewall interface in question is Layer2 or Layer3, and if the firewall is participating in the DHCP/DHCP-Relay configuration for the clients at all.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 03:24:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/caveats-for-changing-interface-netmask/m-p/287253#M76697</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T03:24:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Caveats for changing interface netmask?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/caveats-for-changing-interface-netmask/m-p/287256#M76700</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Could you please more details on where is client subnet which needs to be expected is located in network ?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2019 04:19:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/caveats-for-changing-interface-netmask/m-p/287256#M76700</guid>
      <dc:creator>fatboy1607</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-09T04:19:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

