<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: firebase-cloud-messaging app-id additional ports may be required in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/firebase-cloud-messaging-app-id-additional-ports-may-be-required/m-p/288465#M76846</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good idea to run a tech support file and create a TAC ticket.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PANW typically updates modfiied signatures on a weekly basis.&amp;nbsp; Depending on the timeliness of our entry, we can all enjoy getting an updated signature sooner.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Please let us know what TAC states and keep us in the loop for when a modified signature will be released.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 12:55:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-14T12:55:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>firebase-cloud-messaging app-id additional ports may be required</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/firebase-cloud-messaging-app-id-additional-ports-may-be-required/m-p/288404#M76835</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hey there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here's something that was brought up by one of our teams. According to this kb article cloud messaging also needs these ports.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/concept-options#ports_and_your_firewall" target="_blank"&gt;https://firebase.google.com/docs/cloud-messaging/concept-options#ports_and_your_firewall&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was able to find logs related to this where the application was identified as google-base or unknown-tcp and denied. An app-id signature update may be in order.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Sep 2019 18:25:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/firebase-cloud-messaging-app-id-additional-ports-may-be-required/m-p/288404#M76835</guid>
      <dc:creator>icozma</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-13T18:25:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: firebase-cloud-messaging app-id additional ports may be required</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/firebase-cloud-messaging-app-id-additional-ports-may-be-required/m-p/288465#M76846</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good idea to run a tech support file and create a TAC ticket.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PANW typically updates modfiied signatures on a weekly basis.&amp;nbsp; Depending on the timeliness of our entry, we can all enjoy getting an updated signature sooner.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Please let us know what TAC states and keep us in the loop for when a modified signature will be released.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2019 12:55:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/firebase-cloud-messaging-app-id-additional-ports-may-be-required/m-p/288465#M76846</guid>
      <dc:creator>S.Cantwell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-14T12:55:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

