<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Rulebase Organization and Flow in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rulebase-organization-and-flow/m-p/289152#M76935</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I hate having OCD sometimes because its things like this I struggle with. How are others organizing their rules? Are you grouping them by source IP? Zone? Common Apps? I have "business units" so each business unit has rules. So After each group of business unit rules there needs to be a deny for that "group" So I was starting to organize by source ip, build all the rules and then put a deny from that source to any and move on. But now I am like "But what if other sources need to access those sources but its still a rule for business unit A then it will be in another section based on a different source IP. I don't think there is a right or wrong way to do this and Yes it will be different for all, but I am just trying to get ideas to better help me.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:25:53 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Stevenjwilliams83</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-09-19T13:25:53Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Rulebase Organization and Flow</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rulebase-organization-and-flow/m-p/289152#M76935</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I hate having OCD sometimes because its things like this I struggle with. How are others organizing their rules? Are you grouping them by source IP? Zone? Common Apps? I have "business units" so each business unit has rules. So After each group of business unit rules there needs to be a deny for that "group" So I was starting to organize by source ip, build all the rules and then put a deny from that source to any and move on. But now I am like "But what if other sources need to access those sources but its still a rule for business unit A then it will be in another section based on a different source IP. I don't think there is a right or wrong way to do this and Yes it will be different for all, but I am just trying to get ideas to better help me.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:25:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rulebase-organization-and-flow/m-p/289152#M76935</guid>
      <dc:creator>Stevenjwilliams83</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-19T13:25:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Rulebase Organization and Flow</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rulebase-organization-and-flow/m-p/289170#M76937</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To be honest I have no grouping whatsoever apart from the logical sequence of flow to make things work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tend not to mix source IP, source zone or source user in the same policy to make things less complicated but thats just me....&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The search filter is my saviour....&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2019 13:58:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/rulebase-organization-and-flow/m-p/289170#M76937</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mick_Ball</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-09-19T13:58:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

