<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic What is the deal with VM Panorama mode maximum log storage space? in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/296602#M77983</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Documentation states that VM &lt;STRONG&gt;Panorama mode&lt;/STRONG&gt; can support up to &lt;STRONG&gt;24TB&lt;/STRONG&gt; of log storage on a single virtual appliance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Each logging disk has 2TB of storage capacity for a total maximum of 24TB on a single virtual appliance&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So we add 12 virtual disks with 2TB of storage to the machine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;gt; show system disk details&lt;/EM&gt; shows 12 disks with 2097152 MB of storage. Good.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;gt; show system disk-partition&lt;/EM&gt; is where things get confusing. PAN-OS creates &lt;STRONG&gt;1.7TB &lt;/STRONG&gt;partitions for each disk no matter what:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk /dev/sdb: 2199.0 GB, 2199023255552 bytes, 4294967296 sectors&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk label type: gpt&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;# Start End Size Type Name&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;1 19531 3706898437 1.7T Microsoft basic primary&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk /dev/sdc: 2199.0 GB, 2199023255552 bytes, 4294967296 sectors&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk label type: gpt&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;What exactly is going on here? Why only a range of 9531 - 3706898437 sectors being used? Which effectively limits disk size to roughly 1.7TB.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So now we are left with 20,4TB of total storage, in theory (12 x 1.7).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when we create a Collector Group and select all 12 disks - it only shows Max: 18.38 TB of storage!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone please explain what happens to the rest, almost &lt;STRONG&gt;6TB&lt;/STRONG&gt; of storage?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 07:35:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RMikalauskas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-06T07:35:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What is the deal with VM Panorama mode maximum log storage space?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/296602#M77983</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Documentation states that VM &lt;STRONG&gt;Panorama mode&lt;/STRONG&gt; can support up to &lt;STRONG&gt;24TB&lt;/STRONG&gt; of log storage on a single virtual appliance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Each logging disk has 2TB of storage capacity for a total maximum of 24TB on a single virtual appliance&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So we add 12 virtual disks with 2TB of storage to the machine.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;gt; show system disk details&lt;/EM&gt; shows 12 disks with 2097152 MB of storage. Good.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&amp;gt; show system disk-partition&lt;/EM&gt; is where things get confusing. PAN-OS creates &lt;STRONG&gt;1.7TB &lt;/STRONG&gt;partitions for each disk no matter what:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk /dev/sdb: 2199.0 GB, 2199023255552 bytes, 4294967296 sectors&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk label type: gpt&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;# Start End Size Type Name&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;1 19531 3706898437 1.7T Microsoft basic primary&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk /dev/sdc: 2199.0 GB, 2199023255552 bytes, 4294967296 sectors&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk label type: gpt&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;What exactly is going on here? Why only a range of 9531 - 3706898437 sectors being used? Which effectively limits disk size to roughly 1.7TB.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So now we are left with 20,4TB of total storage, in theory (12 x 1.7).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, when we create a Collector Group and select all 12 disks - it only shows Max: 18.38 TB of storage!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can someone please explain what happens to the rest, almost &lt;STRONG&gt;6TB&lt;/STRONG&gt; of storage?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 07:35:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/296602#M77983</guid>
      <dc:creator>RMikalauskas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-06T07:35:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the deal with VM Panorama mode maximum log storage space?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/296727#M77992</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37852"&gt;@RMikalauskas&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I also had the same issue and here is a detailed article explaining the reason for the discrepancies:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000Cm5aCAC" target="_blank"&gt;https://knowledgebase.paloaltonetworks.com/KCSArticleDetail?id=kA10g000000Cm5aCAC&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2019 15:50:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/296727#M77992</guid>
      <dc:creator>BatD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-06T15:50:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the deal with VM Panorama mode maximum log storage space?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/296954#M78011</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I've read that article. It does not take into account that we are using virtual disks and not actual physical ones, where manufacturers count 1,000,000,000,000 bytes as a Terabyte. When we add 2TB disk in VMware - it is actually TB of size, or 2199023255552 bytes. As shown in PAN-OS itself.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk /dev/sdb: 2199.0 GB, &lt;STRONG&gt;2199023255552&lt;/STRONG&gt; bytes, 4294967296 sectors&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;Disk label type: gpt&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;#&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Start&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; End&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Size&amp;nbsp; Type&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Name&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="2"&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 20480&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3706898431&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;1.7T&amp;nbsp; Microsoft basic primary&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But for some reason it undersizes the partition and &lt;FONT size="3"&gt;allocates only a range of 20480 - 3706898431 sectors, leaving us with 1897921510912 total bytes worth of storage. Which is actually 1.89 TB, not 1.7 TB. But I guess there is some overhead.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;In any case - 588048385 sectors or ~300GB of storage goes "missing" after partitioning. That adds up to 3.6 TB of space if we add 12 drives. Significant, don't you think?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/296954#M78011</guid>
      <dc:creator>RMikalauskas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-07T07:45:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the deal with VM Panorama mode maximum log storage space?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/296956#M78013</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37852"&gt;@RMikalauskas&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;The point I was trying to make is that this is expected behaviour and not a fault. I agree it is misleading and is maybe you should raise it with you Palo Alto SE or Account manager.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2019 07:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/296956#M78013</guid>
      <dc:creator>BatD</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-07T07:55:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the deal with VM Panorama mode maximum log storage space?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/586893#M117113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/37852"&gt;@RMikalauskas&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;did you ever get an answer?&lt;BR /&gt;I have had a case open at Palo TAC for several days now and I have the feeling that nobody there knows (any more) why this is the case.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;"1.7T is the max for 1 partition.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Whatever you are observing is expected behavior.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The system will not allocate more than 1.7T to a partition, even if the disk is bigger.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Let's consider if you have a disk of 4TB size the system will create two partitions of 1.7T and 1.7T size but if you have a disk of 2 TB size it will only create one partition of 1.7T size.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The system creates that partition with exactly the same size of 1.7T to fit in any disk of any vendor of 2TB. It is hardcoded in PanOS and cannot be changed"&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I tried on my lab panorama.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Added a 1TB disk.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;admin@Panorama&amp;gt; show system disk details&lt;BR /&gt;Name : sdb&lt;BR /&gt;State : Present&lt;BR /&gt;Size : 1048576 MB&lt;BR /&gt;Status : Available&lt;BR /&gt;Reason : Admin enabled&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;#show system disk-partition&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;# Start End Size Type Name&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1 20480 2048020479 976.6G Microsoft basic primary&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;from the partition table it should have 976.6G&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;from show system disk-space = 962G&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;admin@Panorama&amp;gt; show system disk-space&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/dev/root 7.9G 4.6G 2.9G 63% /&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;none 7.9G 100K 7.9G 1% /dev&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/dev/sda5 24G 1.4G 22G 6% /opt/pancfg&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/dev/sda6 5.9G 1.4G 4.2G 25% /opt/panrepo&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;tmpfs 7.9G 284M 7.6G 4% /dev/shm&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;cgroup_root 7.9G 0 7.9G 0% /cgroup&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/dev/sda8 32G 1.3G 29G 5% /opt/panlogs&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/dev/loop0 9.8G 23M 9.2G 1% /opt/logbuffer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;/dev/sdb1 962G 77M 913G 1% /opt/panlogs/ld1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;🤷‍&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":male_sign:"&gt;♂️&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 06:08:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/586893#M117113</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbendzus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-16T06:08:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What is the deal with VM Panorama mode maximum log storage space?</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/586895#M117115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Nope. I just stopped worrying about it and accepted it as "by design".&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2024 06:33:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/what-is-the-deal-with-vm-panorama-mode-maximum-log-storage-space/m-p/586895#M117115</guid>
      <dc:creator>RMikalauskas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-16T06:33:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

