<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: DoS protection policy process order in General Topics</title>
    <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dos-protection-policy-process-order/m-p/298202#M78168</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>myky</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-11-13T08:15:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>DoS protection policy process order</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dos-protection-policy-process-order/m-p/297934#M78127</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi All,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Basic question and l think l know the answer but just would like to confirm.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it the same for the DoS protection profiles if you compare with normal security policies, fist match from top to bottom?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a general DoS rule with broad src and dst address groups but the requirement is to exclude few IPs from those groups. l want to create a rule above generic DoS rule and exclude few actions like ICMP flood etc.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thx,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Myky&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 16:36:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dos-protection-policy-process-order/m-p/297934#M78127</guid>
      <dc:creator>myky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-12T16:36:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DoS protection policy process order</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dos-protection-policy-process-order/m-p/298084#M78147</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/118932"&gt;@myky&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You are correct in your assumption, the first entry to match the traffic "wins".&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 22:14:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dos-protection-policy-process-order/m-p/298084#M78147</guid>
      <dc:creator>BPry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-12T22:14:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: DoS protection policy process order</title>
      <link>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dos-protection-policy-process-order/m-p/298202#M78168</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/43480"&gt;@BPry&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Nov 2019 08:15:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/general-topics/dos-protection-policy-process-order/m-p/298202#M78168</guid>
      <dc:creator>myky</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-11-13T08:15:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

